home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.impeach.bush      Debating on impeaching Dubya over 9/11      56,304 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 54,578 of 56,304   
   .impervious to All   
   Re: THE FEAR PRESIDENT   
   16 Feb 04 00:09:29   
   
   XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, soc.culture.usa, alt.activism   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq   
   From: thats***disgusting@hotmail.com   
      
   In news:jfRXb.14555$5W3.10216@nwrddc02.gnilink.net,   
   CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
      
   : .impervious wrote:   
   :: In news:VqPXb.25277$1S1.12777@nwrddc01.gnilink.net,   
   :: CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
   ::   
   :::: No you cannot argue the facts. The fact is that Bush did nothing   
   :::: when he came into office. Except re-empower the terrorists.   
   :::   
   ::: If Bush had 8 years like Clintoon did, we would not be here today,   
   ::: 9-11 would not have happened.   
   ::   
   :: here is where your logic is flawed - Clinton *didn't* have 8 years to   
   :: stop the attack that happened on his watch...  he had thirty-eight   
   :: days. Bush had nine months.   
   :   
   : Clinton had 8 years minus 38 days to ensure that the perpetrators of   
   : the first WTC attack were stopped from ever attacking America again.   
   : He did nothing except prosecute the underlings, he let the major   
   : players go. They attacked two embassies killing US citizens and   
   : foreigners, he let them go, he did nothing. They attacked an American   
   : warship, killed 17 American servicemen, he again did nothing.   
   :   
   :::: Yeah - it's lost me on how negotiating with the bad guys is a good   
   :::: thing.   
   :::   
   ::: I know it is lost on you, but then again that is not surprising.   
   ::   
   :: the reason it's lost on most liberals is because we remember what   
   :: negotiating with the bad guys does...   
   :   
   : Oh.............. do you mean like North Korea?   
   : And the "Agreed Framework"?   
   : I sure hope you learned your lesson on that one..............another   
   : Clintoon blunder.........   
   :   
   :: like putting weapons in the   
   :: hands of Iraq and Iran, helping to form the Taliban, and installing   
   :: countless brutal dictators in countries where we didn't like the   
   :: democratically elected leaders.   
   :   
   : Where we didn't like the "democratically elected leaders"? Can you   
   : cite?   
   :   
   :::: He commissioned Hart-Rudman. That panel specifically predicted the   
   :::: 9/11 attacks.   
   :::   
   ::: Bullshit....... more lies. He did nothing but paper over the problem   
   ::: leaving it for the next administration. Nobody needed a report to   
   ::: see what Clintoon should have seen way before 9-11. He was   
   ::: President you know......he was in charge....or he was supposed to   
   ::: be........   
   ::   
   :: here's where your logic fails again...  if you feel it's okay to say   
   :: what Clinton "should have seen," presumably because it's so glaringly   
   :: obvious, then why don't you hold Bush to the same standard?   
   :   
   : Because Bush didn't have 8 years minus 38 days like Clintoon did.   
   :   
   ::  i mean,   
   :: if no report was needed to see that 9/11 was going to happen, why   
   :: wasn't the guy who was in charge AT THE TIME keeping an eye out?   
   :   
   : After only nine months in office, barely. After a transition to   
   : office that was delayed by holding up his transition office funds for   
   : three months by the liberal legal machine it is no wonder. Is GWB   
   : culpable in 9-11? Certainly, he was in charge of the ship at that   
   : time so just by inference he can be made to appear culpable. Should   
   : he have seen it coming? Certainly, he was in charge of strategically   
   : protecting our country. Could he have predicted it? No, certainly   
   : not. The difference is that Clintoon did have time to do something   
   : about it, he just chose not to. He thought it was best to handle it   
   : as a legal matter, a criminal matter not as an attack against our   
   : country and the act of war that it was. For that poor decision the   
   : WTC was reduced to rubble....................   
   :   
   :: there is just no way you retards can pin this on Clinton, the way you   
   :: try to pin everything on him.   
   :   
   : There isn't? The truth is kinda hard to avoid.......   
   :   
   :: i swear...  you people call us the "blame-America-first" crowd...   
   :: but while we blame terrorists, you blame Clinton (an American).   
   :: sheesh.   
   :   
   : After knowing for 8 years minus 38 days what would you think? Asleep   
   : at the wheel? Inept? Stupid? I mean come on, you justify his   
   : inactions if you wish to defend him. That is what you are trying to   
   : do right?   
      
   all of your rambling is pointless.  it's easy to bang blame wherever you   
   like, but the fact is, Bush has followed the course that Clinton laid   
   out just before he left office.  except, of course, the illegal and   
   pointless war in Iraq.   
      
   you do nothing but prove your hypocrisy, when you try to blame Clinton   
   for everything that happened before and after his presidency.  why   
   wasn't it GHWB's fault that WTC '93 occurred?  because it was the   
   *terrorists* fault, stupid.  nobody can do anything other than speculate   
   about anything that hasn't happened, or isn't a part of history.   
   history records that Clinton tripled the antiterrorism budget for the   
   FBI, and doubled it overall...  that he fought tooth and nail with the   
   republican congress for MORE counterterror funding and lost...  that he   
   commissioned reports on the status of the world's terrorists and   
   actively pursued them.  the civilian in charge of Iraq right now, Paul   
   Bremer, called Clinton "obsessed" with terrorism.  if you choose to   
   ignore the fact that Clinton did more to prevent terrorism than any   
   president before or after him, you're as big a moron as you keep coming   
   across as.  why is it that republicans refuse to give ANY democrat ANY   
   credit for ANYthing they ever do?  fucking hypocrites.   
      
   --   
   Some of us feel that Mr. Bush will find the real liars about the Iraq   
   war and about the economy on the same day that O. J. turns up the real   
   murderers.   
   -rbbomber   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca