home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.impeach.bush      Debating on impeaching Dubya over 9/11      56,304 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 54,600 of 56,304   
   CH to .impervious   
   Re: THE FEAR PRESIDENT   
   16 Feb 04 01:08:01   
   
   XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, soc.culture.usa, alt.activism   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq   
   From: pinkfloppybitsdatstank@hotmail.com   
      
   .impervious wrote:   
   > In news:6fSXb.14629$5W3.4187@nwrddc02.gnilink.net,   
   > CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
   >   
   >>> You   
   >>> don't. In fact, Clinton prevented an attack.   
   >>   
   >> And just which attack was this? Can you elaborate?   
   >   
   > i, for one, would be glad to.  Clinton prevented attacks on the UN   
   > Headquarters in New York, the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, the FBI   
   > Building, the Israeli Embassy in D.C., the LA and Boston airports, the   
   > George Washington Bridge, and the US Embassy in Tirana, Albania (which   
   > is considered American soil).  also, there was the much-hyped   
   > Millenium Bomber...  Clinton took out al-Qaeda cells in more than 20   
   > countries, and CREATED a national security post to oversee and   
   > coordinate all federal counterterrorism activity.  his first and   
   > second crime bills were practically entirely comprised of   
   > anti-terrorism legislation, and he created a national stockpile of   
   > drugs and vaccines in case of biological or chemical attacks.  after   
   > the Embassy bombings, Clinton issued a Presidential Directive   
   > authorizing the assassination of Osama bin Laden.  by any measure, he   
   > was the first President to aggressively tackle the problem of   
   > terrorism.   
      
   Looks like he kinda missed the boat on al queda though and that is my point.   
   al queda should have been taken out during Clintoon's term not covered up   
   with a bunch of federal funding. When you only take defensive measures when   
   you are being attacked...it looks like he kinda missed the boat.   
      
   >  wanna guess who thought up the idea of a Department of   
   > Homeland Security?  wanna guess who scoffed at the notion?   
   >   
   > were you even LIVING here at the time?  i mean, do you fucking know   
   > anything at all?  or have you just picked up the party lie - i mean,   
   > line - that Clinton sat on his ass while terrorists took over the   
   > world?   
   >   
   > there IS NO TERRORIST THREAT.  Bush rules through fear, and that's why   
   > you think he's out there fighting terrorists...  he's not.  he's   
   > certainly not preventing anything.   
      
   Then why am I not scared? You watch waaaaaay to much TV dude...........   
      
   > look at it this way:   
   >   
   > in the year 2000, your chances of dying in a terrorist attack on the   
   > US were a big, fat zero.   
   >   
   > in the year 2002, your chances of dying in a terrorist attack on the   
   > US were a big, fat zero.   
   >   
   > in the year 2003, your chances of dying in a terrorist attack on the   
   > US were a big, fat zero.   
   >   
   > the only year you did have a chance was in 2001, and your chances were   
   > still 1 in 100,000.   
   >   
   > in 2001, you had a greater chance of dying:   
   >   
   > - from pneumonia (1 in 4,500)   
   > - by suicide (1 in 9,200)   
   > - in a homicide (1 in 14,000)   
   > - in a car accident (1 in 6,500)   
   >   
   > where was the government?  why wasn't anyone freaking out about this   
   > apparent pneumonia epidemic?  where were the Orange Alerts?  why   
   > didn't we bomb anybody?  looking at just the suicide rate, it means   
   > we were a greater danger to OURSELVES than terrorists were to us in   
   > 2001.   
      
   ha-ha I find it a little pathetic that you do not know the difference   
   between normal causes of death and targeted killing of civilians for   
   political purposes, you are one of those people that will need to be shown   
   the dead bodies before you believe that these people are out to get us.   
   There is 3000 in NY already, how many more will it take before you realize   
   the implications of being wrong.   
      
   > you're simply banding together with the rest of the idiots who need to   
   > be told how to live their lives by the tickers on CNN and FNC.  watch   
   > the FACTS, and stop interpreting them.   
      
   Seems to me you are the one having a hard time interpreting the facts, like   
   I said you watch waaay to much TV.   
      
   --   
   Cliff   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca