home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.impeach.bush      Debating on impeaching Dubya over 9/11      56,304 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 54,616 of 56,304   
   John Griffin to pkgojak   
   Re: What Republican would have a chance    
   16 Feb 04 01:51:09   
   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   From: thathillbilly@yahooie.com   
      
   "pkgojak"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   > "John Griffin"  wrote in message   
   > news:Xns9490BDD82A0thathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.17...   
   >> Rabid Roedy's Clipping Service wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > With Bush going down the tubes, and no good news for him   
   >> > in sight (e.g. Mikey's movie Fahrenheit 911), who could   
   >> > pick up the Republican standard and have a decent shot   
   >> > at winning?   
   >> >   
   >> > McCain is probably the best bet.  He has distanced   
   >> > himself reasonably from Bush.  Others who opposed the   
   >> > Patriot Act or who demanded proof on the Iraq war might   
   >> > appear sufficiently clean.   
   >>   
   >> You're always worth a few chuckles, parroting the stuff   
   >> you've clipped as though they were your thoughts.   
   >>   
   >> As they say, time will tell. Republicans will vote for the   
   >> President.  Most independents will vote for the incumbent.   
   >   
   > Who says?   
      
   I forgot.  It happens, though.  Name familiarity is among the   
   biggest driving forces in any election among those who aren't   
   "aligned."   
      
   >> Democrats openly boast that they'd mindlessly vote for any   
   >> man, woman or beast with a D beside his name.   
   >   
   > Which democrats? I didn't get their names, but I've heard that   
   enough times recently that it seems to be policy.   
      
   >   It's likely that Bush   
   >> will announce the capture of bin Laden and show us Iraq's   
   >> mass murder arsenal a couple of days before the election.   
   >   
   > It's time for the arsenal now.    Not likely though..now or   
   > then it seems.   
      
   It seems?  How's that?  Bush is a sneaky sumbitch.   
      
   > Resentful   
   >> culls like you will howl like little kids. No one knows   
   >> whether the dirty trick will  get enough of the   
   >> independents' votes to get him reelected.   
   >   
   > I thought the independents would vote for the incumbent?   
   >   
   >   
   > You're not as smart as you think you are, Chuckles.   
      
   Let me tell you about the word "most."  Oh, fuck it...deaf ears,   
   especially on an obvious lamer, aren't worth the trouble.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca