Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.impeach.bush    |    Debating on impeaching Dubya over 9/11    |    56,304 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,623 of 56,304    |
|    CH to .impervious    |
|    Re: THE FEAR PRESIDENT    |
|    16 Feb 04 02:14:22    |
      XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, soc.culture.usa, alt.activism       XPost: soc.culture.iraq       From: pinkfloppybitsdatstank@hotmail.com              .impervious wrote:       > In news:fxUXb.27869$1S1.6016@nwrddc01.gnilink.net,       > CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:       >       >>> all of your rambling is pointless. it's easy to bang blame wherever       >>> you like, but the fact is, Bush has followed the course that Clinton       >>> laid out just before he left office.       >>       >> No shit sherlock, now you are getting the point.............       >       > so if you think Bush is doing the right thing,              I do..........              > and you agree that       > Clinton laid the plan out just before he left,              The point was that Clintoon knew there was a threat an didn't take care of       it. Bush did follow thorough after 9-11.....Clintoon didn't after the first       attack. Oh sure he spent a lot studying it and got lucky in a few cases but       overall he dropped the ball bigtime              > then you have to agree       > that CLINTON'S plan is the "right thing" that Bush is doing!              You are confusing agreeing that there is a problem that Clintoon knew about       and agreeing about the actions taken about that problem. Clintoon (again)       knew there was a problem and did very very little. Bush however when       presented with a very similar "problem" took immediate action, something       that if Clintoon had done years ago, we would not have had 9-11 at all.              > can't you even read what you write yourself?              You seem to be the one a might bit confused here.              >>> you do nothing but prove your hypocrisy, when you try to blame       >>> Clinton for everything that happened before and after his       >>> presidency.       >>       >> I am not trying to blame him for everything, just the things he is       >> culpable for.       >>       >>> why       >>> wasn't it GHWB's fault that WTC '93 occurred?       >>       >> Of course not.       >>       >>> because it was the       >>> *terrorists* fault, stupid.       >>       >> It was our fault because we did not do anything about it.       >       > bah - and you guys say democrats blame America.       >       >>> nobody can do anything other than       >>> speculate about anything that hasn't happened, or isn't a part of       >>> history.       >>       >> And that is why I said history speaks for itself.       >>       >>> history records that Clinton tripled the antiterrorism       >>> budget for the FBI, and doubled it overall... that he fought tooth       >>> and nail with the republican congress for MORE counterterror funding       >>> and lost... that he commissioned reports on the status of the       >>> world's terrorists and actively pursued them. the civilian in       >>> charge of Iraq right now, Paul Bremer, called Clinton "obsessed"       >>> with terrorism. if you choose to ignore the fact that Clinton did       >>> more to prevent terrorism than any president before or after him,       >>> you're as big a moron as you keep coming across as.       >>       >> Clinton talked a good talk that was all. He studied and he fretted       >> and worried, but in the final tally he accomplished very little. GWB       >> has done more in the little time he has been in office that Clintoon       >> ever considered doing. Bush is a man of action, Clintoon is a man of       >> words. You cannot use only words to fight terrorists that attack you       >> on your own soil, you have to have strong words and actions to       >> counter the threat.       >>       >>> why is it that republicans       >>> refuse to give ANY democrat ANY credit for ANYthing they ever do?       >>       >> Because democrats have accomplished very little in this respect.       >> Don't listen to their words, judge them by their actions.       >>       >>> fucking hypocrites.       >>       >> Nice words..............       >       > you are categorically wrong in every aspect of your assertions about       > Clinton's efforts to prevent terrorism. the fact is, Clinton did       > EVERY FUCKING THING better than Bush could ever dream of doing, and       > still found time to wail on the sax.              Clinton is the worst President I have ever seen and I have been alive for       quite a few. He was a traitor to the American people in the worst ways. He       ranks right below Jimmy Carter on the scale of things accomplished (very       little) and right alongside Nixon for being a liar, history will prove me       correct on this. Jabber and bitch and whine about what I say, I could care       less...............              --       Cliff              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca