XPost: talk.politics.libertarian, talk.politics.guns   
   From: oglethorpe@oglethorpe.com   
      
   "Yardpilot"  wrote in message   
   news:9l1Yb.332578$na.489564@attbi_s04...   
   >   
   >  wrote in message   
   > news:40e030db3efov8k54rlpgdnr2a01hublmg@4ax.com...   
   > > On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:22:40 GMT, Emi M Briet    
   > > wrote:   
   > >   
   > > >In article ,   
   > > > Roedy Green  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > >> Basically heat from jet fuel fires caused braces to   
   > > >> expand, pop rivets then there was nothing to hold the building in.   
   > > >   
   > > >Already debunked on numerous websites....jet fuel simply doesn't get   
   hot   
   > > >enough to do that...   
   > >   
   > > It's just kerosene.  And yet bush tells us that it melted the steel   
   > > frame of the building and caused it to collapse ....and to collapse   
   > > straight down as in a perfect demolition job.   
   >   
   > Do you know that difference between "melted" and "weakened?" I didn't   
   think   
   > so.   
   >   
   >   
   Does judy know what kind of extra heet was put out by the burning of the   
   building materials - faned by the wind coming through the big holes punched   
   by the planes?   
      
   -*MORT*-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)