Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.impeach.bush    |    Debating on impeaching Dubya over 9/11    |    56,304 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,819 of 56,304    |
|    cyber to All    |
|    Ramsey Clark sez; (1/3)    |
|    16 Feb 04 08:51:46    |
      From: georgekspam@humboldt1.com              OPEN LETTER FROM RAMSEY CLARK       to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, members of the UN Security Council       and President George W. Bush              Dear VoteToImpeach / ImpeachBush.org Member,              Please post this open letter from Ramsey Clark widely. On March 20,       join Ramsey Clark and thousands of others in the mass protest at Times       Square in New York City to demand "Impeach Bush" and "Bring the troops       home now," and more. If you have not yet signed the demand to Impeach       Bush, click here to cast your vote, and to access the materials       available at the new Impeach Bush Resource Center, click here. Check       your email in the coming days for more information on the March 20       demonstration in New York City and those being held around the country       to learn how you can join the Impeach Bush contingents.                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------       -------              January, 29, 2004              Dear Secretary General Annan,              U.S. President George W. Bush again confirmed his intention to       continue waging wars of aggression in his State of the Union message       on January 20, 2004.              He began his address:       “ As we gather tonight, hundreds of thousands of American service men       and women are deployed across the world in the war on terror. By       bringing hope to the oppressed, and delivering justice to the violent,       they are making America more secure.”              He proclaimed:       “ Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American       people... America is on the offensive against the terrorists...”              Continuing, he said:       “ ...our coalition is leading aggressive raids against the surviving       members of the Taliban and Al Qaeda.... Men who ran away from our       troops in battle are now dispersed and attack from the shadows.”              In Iraq, he reported:       “ Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or       killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols       a day, and conducting an average of 180 raids a week....”              Explaining his aggression, President Bush stated:       “ ...After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not       enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and       their supporters declared war on the United States and war is what       they got.”              Forget law. No more legal papers, or rights. Forget truth. The claim       that either Afghanistan, or Iraq declared war on the U.S. is absurd.       The U.S. chose to attack both nations, from one end to the other,       violating their sovereignty and changing their "regimes", summarily       executing thousands of men, women and children in the process. At       least 40,000 defenseless people in Iraq have been killed by U.S.       violence since the latest aggression began in earnest in March 2003       starting with its celebrated, high tech, terrorist "Shock and Awe" and       continuing until now with 25, or more, U.S. raids daily causing       mounting deaths and injuries.              All this death-dealing aggression has occurred during a period, Mr.       Bush boasts, of "over two years without an attack on American soil".       The U.S. is guilty of pure aggression, arbitrary repression and false       portrayal of the nature and purpose of its violence.              President Bush's brutish mentality is revealed in his condemnations of       the "killers" and "thugs in Iraq" "who ran away from our troops in       battle". U.S. military expenditures and technology threaten and       impoverish life on the planet. Any army that sought to stand up       against U.S. air power and weapons of mass destruction in open battle       would be annihilated. This is what President Bush seeks when he says       "Bring 'em on."              President Bush declared his intention to change the "Middle East" by       force.       “ As long as the Middle East remains a place of tyranny and despair       and anger, it will continue to produce men and movements that threaten       the safety of America and our friends. So America is pursuing a       forward strategy of freedom in the greater Middle East. We will       challenge the enemies of reform, confront the allies of terror, and       expect a higher standard from our friends.”              “...America is a nation with a mission... we understand our special       calling: This great republic will lead the cause of freedom.”              He extended his threat to any nation he may choose:       “ As part of the offensive against terror, we are also confronting the       regimes that harbor and support terrorists, and could supply them with       nuclear, chemical or biological weapons. The United States and our       allies are determined: We refuse to live in the shadow of this       ultimate danger.”              President Bush's utter contempt for the United Nations is revealed in       his assertion that the United States and other countries "have       enforced the demands of the United Nations", ignoring the refusal of       the U.N. to approve a war of aggression against Iraq and implying the       U.N. had neither the courage nor the capacity to pursue its own       "demands".              His total commitment to unilateral U.S. action, was asserted by       President Bush when he sarcastically referred to the "permission slip"       a school child needs to leave a classroom:       " America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of       our people".              President Bush intends to go it alone, because his interest is       American power and wealth alone, though he prefers to use the youth of       NATO countries and others as cannon folder in his wars.              President Bush believes might makes right and that the end justifies       the means. He declares:       “ ...the world without Saddam Husseins regime is a better and safer       place".              So U.S. military technology which is omnicidal- capable of destroying       all life on the planet-will be ordered by President Bush to make the       world "a better and safer place" by destroying nations and individuals       he designates.              President Bush presided over 152 executions in Texas, far more than       any other U.S. governor since World War II. Included were women,       minors, retarded persons, aliens in violation of the Vienna Convention       on Diplomatic Relations and innocent persons. He never acted to       prevent a single execution. He has publicly proclaimed the right to       assassinate foreign leaders and repeatedly boasted of summary       executions and indiscriminate killing in State of the Union messages       and elsewhere.              The danger of Bush unilateralism is further revealed when he states:       “ Colonel Qaddafi correctly judged that his country would be better       off, and far more secure without weapons of mass murder. Nine months       of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain       succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not.”              Forget diplomacy, use "intense negotiations". If President Bush       believed it was "diplomacy", which maintained genocidal sanctions       against Iraq for twelve years that failed, rather than an effort to       crush Iraq to submission, then why didn't he use "nine months of       intense negotiations" to avoid a war of aggression against Iraq? He       was President for nearly twenty seven months before the criminal       assault on Iraq, he apparently intended all along. Iraq was no threat       to anyone.              What President Bush means by "intense negotiations" includes a threat       of military aggression with the example of Iraq to show this in no              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca