XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, soc.culture.usa, alt.activism   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq   
   From: pinkfloppybitsdatstank@hotmail.com   
      
   .impervious wrote:   
   > In news:Ye8Yb.15702$5W3.6694@nwrddc02.gnilink.net,   
   > CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
   >   
   >> .impervious wrote:   
   >>> In news:s75Yb.15602$5W3.11435@nwrddc02.gnilink.net,   
   >>> CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> You hit them where they live, you don't just sit back and wait   
   >>>>>> for them to come to us, just as GWB has done.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> bingo - so why did we go to Iraq?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> they don't "live" there, and never did.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Who the hell said Iraq MORON.   
   >>>   
   >>> you did.   
   >>   
   >> Shows again that you assume waaay too much. I was referring to   
   >> Afghanistan. And now you are a liar.......   
   >   
   > so then answer the question -   
      
   What question..........you were trying to prove how much Clintoon did to   
   prevent 9-11 and I have been proving you wrong.   
      
   > if we're fighting a War On Terror, what   
   > the fuck are we doing in Iraq?  bombing Afghanistan wasn't anything   
   > more or less than what Clinton did.  in fact, Clinton bombed MORE   
   > countries than Bush has so far.   
      
   Clintoon didn't do squat. We now have boots on the ground. Clintoon didn't   
   do anything except call lawyers, consultants and commission studies.   
      
   >>> you said "hit them where they live."  if that's what you're supposed   
   >>> to do, in your opinion, about terrorists, then why did we go to   
   >>> Iraq?   
   >>>   
   >>>>> CLINTON was the one who sent the bombs to WHERE THEY LIVED, you   
   >>>>> dumbass.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Clintoon did squat, he sat back and "lobbed a few cruise missles at   
   >>>> them" History IS history unless of course if you are a   
   >>>> liberal.......   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The only Dumbass here is yourself .   
   >>   
   >> ha-ha-ha seeing how history is on my side I find you laughable......   
   >   
   > you're replying to your insult to me.  that's priceless.   
   >   
   >>> so we finally come to the conclusion of your side of the debate -   
   >>> the part where you simply repeat yourself because you have nothing   
   >>> new to say.   
   >>   
   >> No it's where all of us realize that you cannot answer anything   
   >   
   > uh-oh...  "all of you"...?  you mean the whole group is against me   
   > now?   
      
   And just what support do you have?   
      
   > it is the mark of a beaten man to need to claim the support of an   
   > entire group who have never professed their support.   
      
   ha-ha-ha-ha you are again laughable.   
      
   >>> i keep feeding you facts,   
   >>   
   >> You feed nothing but propaganda, mixed with little tidbits of partial   
   >> truth.   
   >   
   > the fact that you call history propaganda is indicative of nearly   
   > every idiot republican i've ever met.   
      
   History is not propaganda.....your version of history is. It is plain as   
   day.................   
      
   >>> and you keep saying Clinton did nothing.  i   
   >>> give you numbers, dates...  you deny it all.   
   >>   
   >> I didn't deny it all moron, I denied that he did enough to stop the   
   >> 9-11 bombing. Which he didn't. History proves me right.   
   >   
   > you are right - Clinton didn't stop 9/11.   
      
   And he did very little to stop it. Now we are getting   
   somewhere...................   
      
   > neither did Bush 41...   
      
   Not on his shift........   
      
   > neither did Reagan...   
      
   Not on his shift........   
      
   > neither did Carter...   
      
   Not on his shift........   
      
      
   > al-Qaeda was formed during Carter's administration.  NOBODY did enough   
   > to prevent 9/11.  but at least Clinton laid out a plan, which Dubya   
   > has followed.  the fact that Clinton didn't carry out the plan is not   
   > a matter of inaction, it's a matter of TIMING.   
      
   Sure timing........that's it. He was waiting...right? Waiting for 3000+   
   people to die so that it then became politically correct.   
      
   >>> you are the third most   
   >>> exasperatingly stupid, redneck, kneejerk right-winger i have had the   
   >>> displeasure of schooling in this group, right after HOD and CEP.   
   >>> what is it with the initials?   
   >>   
   >> First of all your are not "schooling" me as you have nothing to say   
   >> that is of real importance. I have already shown you that Clintoon   
   >> did not prevent 9-11, even with his efforts to let the lawyers handle   
   >> it was not the effort that you claim it was. Anybody can study,   
   >> survey and commission reports. Never send a lawyer to a   
   >> gunfight........unless you want to lose.   
   >   
   > again, to deny that Clinton aggressively pursued terrorists more than   
   > any other president in history is not only laughable, but a lie.  i   
   > suppose you think Reagan did a better job, though...   
      
   The evidence speaks for itself, if Clintoon was so great then how did 9-11   
   happen?   
      
   --   
   Cliff   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)