XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, soc.culture.usa, alt.activism   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq   
   From: pinkfloppybitsdatstank@hotmail.com   
      
   Edw wrote:   
   > "CH"  wrote in message   
   > news:6rXXb.28644$1S1.10945@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...   
   >> .impervious wrote:   
   >>> In news:q%VXb.28355$1S1.10001@nwrddc01.gnilink.net,   
   >>> CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Clinton aggressively pursued terrorists.  period.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Clintoon aggressively pursued squat. He may have "pursued"   
   >>>> terrorists but nothing was aggressively done.   
   >>>   
   >>> what kind of nothing did he do?   
   >>>   
   >>> i mean, no bombings?  no investigations?  no plans?   
   >>>   
   >>> short of war, what exactly is there to aggressively do?  and, short   
   >>> of another War On A Noun, which have always failed (think War On   
   >>> Drugs or War On Poverty), how does one aggressively pursue   
   >>> terrorists other   
   >>> than in efforts to discover and thwart their plans?   
   >>   
   >> You hit them where they live, you don't just sit back and wait for   
   >> them to come to us, just as GWB has done.   
   >   
   >   
   > They weren't in Iraq.  Bush missed them in Afghanistan.  How did he   
   > "hit them where they live?"  You are pathetic.   
      
   It's called "boots on the ground" . Something Clintoon did not have the   
   balls, courage or conviction to do......he was worthless......my point   
   exactly   
      
   --   
   Cliff   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)