XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, soc.culture.usa, alt.activism   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq   
   From: thats***disgusting@hotmail.com   
      
   In news:Vi9Yb.31828$1S1.8367@nwrddc01.gnilink.net,   
   CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
      
   : .impervious wrote:   
   :: In news:Ye8Yb.15702$5W3.6694@nwrddc02.gnilink.net,   
   :: CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
   ::   
   ::: .impervious wrote:   
   :::: In news:s75Yb.15602$5W3.11435@nwrddc02.gnilink.net,   
   :::: CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:   
   ::::   
   ::::::: You hit them where they live, you don't just sit back and wait   
   ::::::: for them to come to us, just as GWB has done.   
   ::::::   
   :::::: bingo - so why did we go to Iraq?   
   ::::::   
   :::::: they don't "live" there, and never did.   
   :::::   
   ::::: Who the hell said Iraq MORON.   
   ::::   
   :::: you did.   
   :::   
   ::: Shows again that you assume waaay too much. I was referring to   
   ::: Afghanistan. And now you are a liar.......   
   ::   
   :: so then answer the question -   
   :   
   : What question..........you were trying to prove how much Clintoon did   
   : to prevent 9-11 and I have been proving you wrong.   
      
   you ask "what question" as though i haven't been repeating it over and   
   over...  WHY DID WE GO TO IRAQ TO FIGHT TERROR?   
      
   YOU are the one who said "hit them where they live," and then you said   
   that GWB had done that - i'm asking how you think he did that by going   
   to Iraq.   
      
   :: if we're fighting a War On Terror, what   
   :: the fuck are we doing in Iraq?  bombing Afghanistan wasn't anything   
   :: more or less than what Clinton did.  in fact, Clinton bombed MORE   
   :: countries than Bush has so far.   
   :   
   : Clintoon didn't do squat. We now have boots on the ground. Clintoon   
   : didn't do anything except call lawyers, consultants and commission   
   : studies.   
      
   more repetition from you - just keep saying the same thing over and   
   over...  maybe someday you'll fool somebody.   
      
   :::: you said "hit them where they live."  if that's what you're   
   :::: supposed to do, in your opinion, about terrorists, then why did we   
   :::: go to Iraq?   
   ::::   
   :::::: CLINTON was the one who sent the bombs to WHERE THEY LIVED, you   
   :::::: dumbass.   
   :::::   
   ::::: Clintoon did squat, he sat back and "lobbed a few cruise missles   
   ::::: at them" History IS history unless of course if you are a   
   ::::: liberal.......   
   :::::   
   ::::: The only Dumbass here is yourself .   
   :::   
   ::: ha-ha-ha seeing how history is on my side I find you laughable......   
   ::   
   :: you're replying to your insult to me.  that's priceless.   
   ::   
   :::: so we finally come to the conclusion of your side of the debate -   
   :::: the part where you simply repeat yourself because you have nothing   
   :::: new to say.   
   :::   
   ::: No it's where all of us realize that you cannot answer anything   
   ::   
   :: uh-oh...  "all of you"...?  you mean the whole group is against me   
   :: now?   
   :   
   : And just what support do you have?   
      
   i don't need to claim group support.  i am confident enough in my   
   ability to debate that i need not call up the non-existent support of   
   people who don't know me to bolster my claims.   
      
   :: it is the mark of a beaten man to need to claim the support of an   
   :: entire group who have never professed their support.   
   :   
   : ha-ha-ha-ha you are again laughable.   
   :   
   :::: i keep feeding you facts,   
   :::   
   ::: You feed nothing but propaganda, mixed with little tidbits of   
   ::: partial truth.   
   ::   
   :: the fact that you call history propaganda is indicative of nearly   
   :: every idiot republican i've ever met.   
   :   
   : History is not propaganda.....your version of history is. It is plain   
   : as day.................   
   :   
   :::: and you keep saying Clinton did nothing.  i   
   :::: give you numbers, dates...  you deny it all.   
   :::   
   ::: I didn't deny it all moron, I denied that he did enough to stop the   
   ::: 9-11 bombing. Which he didn't. History proves me right.   
   ::   
   :: you are right - Clinton didn't stop 9/11.   
   :   
   : And he did very little to stop it. Now we are getting   
   : somewhere...................   
   :   
   :: neither did Bush 41...   
   :   
   : Not on his shift........   
   :   
   :: neither did Reagan...   
   :   
   : Not on his shift........   
   :   
   :: neither did Carter...   
   :   
   : Not on his shift........   
      
   you morons have to quit with the "shift" crap - you can't have it both   
   ways...  either it makes a difference for an attack to have occurred on   
   one president's "shift," or it doesn't.  if you want to say it matters,   
   then Dubya is culpable for 9/11.  if you want to say it doesn't, then   
   Bush, Sr. is culpable for WTC '93.   
      
   :: al-Qaeda was formed during Carter's administration.  NOBODY did   
   :: enough to prevent 9/11.  but at least Clinton laid out a plan, which   
   :: Dubya has followed.  the fact that Clinton didn't carry out the plan   
   :: is not a matter of inaction, it's a matter of TIMING.   
   :   
   : Sure timing........that's it. He was waiting...right? Waiting for   
   : 3000+ people to die so that it then became politically correct.   
      
   it's timing because the plan was not formulated until just before he   
   left office...   
      
   :::: you are the third most   
   :::: exasperatingly stupid, redneck, kneejerk right-winger i have had   
   :::: the displeasure of schooling in this group, right after HOD and   
   :::: CEP. what is it with the initials?   
   :::   
   ::: First of all your are not "schooling" me as you have nothing to say   
   ::: that is of real importance. I have already shown you that Clintoon   
   ::: did not prevent 9-11, even with his efforts to let the lawyers   
   ::: handle it was not the effort that you claim it was. Anybody can   
   ::: study, survey and commission reports. Never send a lawyer to a   
   ::: gunfight........unless you want to lose.   
   ::   
   :: again, to deny that Clinton aggressively pursued terrorists more than   
   :: any other president in history is not only laughable, but a lie.  i   
   :: suppose you think Reagan did a better job, though...   
   :   
   : The evidence speaks for itself, if Clintoon was so great then how did   
   : 9-11 happen?   
      
   because of TERRORISTS, you moron.   
      
   --   
   Some of us feel that Mr. Bush will find the real liars about the Iraq   
   war and about the economy on the same day that O. J. turns up the real   
   murderers.   
   -rbbomber   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)