XPost: uk.religion, alt.politics, uk.religion.islam   
   XPost: alt.poltiics.gw-bush   
   From: dolfboek@hotmail.com   
      
   My own doctor the next day, read the letters of demand which I made to   
   Dr Mark Bloch and queried why I had provided a copy to the Sydney   
   Holocaust Museum. In giving him a copy of my book on CD ROM, I remarked   
   of my capability to argue (as I do in one of my chapters) against the   
   German Philosopher Heidegger as the foremost philosopher of the 21st   
   century. Whilst the subject is too weighty and burdensome for 32yo   
   SexyGerman79 who fell silent, but had there been any infraction of   
   Jewish sensibilities, we would have heard the outrage. And there has   
   been none of which I have been made aware. He then brought up the   
   circumstance of the recent and extraordinary unrest as outrage which is   
   promulgated throughout the Muslim world--Well its already 10 years into   
   the war, and the Americans have only just now determined which “Shock   
   and Awe” tactic was the most effective way to prosecute the war. Then   
   you simply just fuck them over with a feigned sincerity as apology for   
   what was accidental in action. But is always known by its consequential   
   effect and the reality of it being viewed by others as an intentioned   
   evil malice.   
      
   Perhaps it is really just a consideration as evidence of the hypocrisy   
   which is intrinsic to Islamic religious belief, because there has been   
   no similar outrage about the sacrilegious character of my own cartoon   
   and surreal painting (self portrait) as a pillorying and polymorphic   
   crucifixion of Christ (1996). They may well find it one day, and whilst   
   this deification will surely offend Roman Catholics, who would consider   
   it a debasement of their most sacred symbols, and their cultural   
   response is a haunting reality which will never leave them. As they are   
   entirely adverse towards it as the single cause and a reminder to them   
   for the remaining term of their natural life, that theirs is a most   
   certain destiny and a rampage towards a final and an everlasting death.   
   It is entirely unknown as to whether this offends Islamic sensibilities   
   to the same heightened manner as the desecration of the Koran. It   
   firstly requires drawing their attention towards a knowledge of its   
   existence, before any determination of its effectiveness can be made:   
      
   “Those who attacked the Diggers’ graves are clearly of the same ilk and   
   are obviously wish to resist the beckoning call of civilisation.   
   Remember when they hung that offensive Piss Christ photo at the National   
   Gallery? It was an image of a plastic crucifix immersed in the urine of   
   its gutless creator, Andres Serrano. The Catholic Archbishop of   
   Melbourne George Pell sought a Supreme Court injunction to prevent the   
   picture going on display. That failed, and Pell unhappily accepted the   
   umpire’s verdict.   
      
      
   In Melbourne, two young blokes hit the picture with a hammer and, later,   
   it was torn from the wall. Pell condemned the attackers. Of course it   
   was grossly offensive to Christians, but they didn’t set out to kill   
   Serrano, nor did he need to go in to hiding. It goes without saying that   
   Serrano didn’t have the courage to do something similar to an image of   
   Mohammad. I wonder what might have been the reaction of Australia’s   
   rightly insulted Muslims.” [Some ungrateful Libyan Muslims desecrate our   
   history, By Alan Howe, Herald Sun 5 March 2012]   
      
      
   I joked with him about what would likely to have happened yesterday and   
   whether I would have been involuntarily sectioned, if they had known,   
   that my singular intention was to effect a disdainful brutalisation of   
   them by the slaughter of the nuns who own the shop--And I proudly   
   expressed the view of its anticipated effectiveness, in being for them   
   an especially enhanced and grievous reality by virtue of the fact that   
   the Catholic nuns live within a worldview as delusional claim to   
   superiority, where they mistakenly believe there is no verity and surety   
   greater to their own belief. As they simply have no awareness of   
   something much greater than them. It therefore has the very real   
   capability of manifesting a most pronounced distress as uncontrolled   
   anxieties and palpitations. A loss of bodily function and breathing   
   control, an incapacity of speech and most probably resulting in death,   
   as my intentioned act of a most discomforting awareness of a loss of   
   soul. A judgement and revenge made against them. What do you think is   
   implied by the claim that I would effect a collapse and forfeiture by   
   the Catholic Religious Order, who have no remaining legitimacy within   
   Australian life?   
      
   I described to him, my well intentioned purpose, which I conveyed before   
   even beginning the 3 hrs of pleading my own cause of liberty with the   
   psychiatrists yesterday. I had sought to protect them (purposefully left   
   in draft disposition in that specific regard) in relation to the   
   mechanics of the document. And described it’s capability for manifesting   
   trauma as notionally equivalent to getting on the cross with Jesus. And   
   explained to them that whilst no harm was being intentioned towards   
   them. That should their sensibilities be moved to an empathy with my   
   representations, they should clearly convey their free accept of it. The   
   course of my presentation, would then focus on how the methodology, as   
   recourse to the habitual use of obstructions, which move one towards the   
   concealment of any intentioned process and instead having a reliance   
   upon scurrilous distortions of any immediacy and capability for threat   
   for actuality, has a mitigating effect on the permissibility of   
   authority under the legislation.   
      
   At one point I brought to their attention, the expressed need to avoid   
   the risky action of reading and consuming the document at too rapid and   
   careless rate. As you may unnecessarily enter into a painful anxious   
   state of fear which rendered them incapable of speech. That I was   
   responding to the outstanding matter of psychiatrist Peter Sternhell’s   
   slanderous characterisations of the substantial reality, vital   
   effectiveness and the substance of my own religious belief. The   
   improper, immodest and blasphemous characterisation by them, as being   
   irrational and delusional was often repeated without substantiation by   
   Dr. Meredith Stone (and I have seen her with child). To whom I have also   
   intentioned to effect a similar retaliation against those persons, as a   
   consequence to their slanderous, false and haughty characterisations of   
   me and my belief as delusional and as cause for their sado-masochistic   
   perversity to which I was then subject to their pleasure and the   
   pretence as beneficial claim of a therapeutic process. In having   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)