XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.liberal
XPost: alt.politics.obama
From: nsmontassoc@yahoo.com
On 7/9/2012 5:54 PM, Eddie Haskell wrote:
> "anon" wrote in message news:5pcgmk.cfp.19.1@news.alt.net...
>> "Columnist Andrew McCarthy gives us what probably is the most important
>> question regarding the upcoming presidential election.
>>
>> "Mitt Romney is the nominee, so I will enthusiastically support his
>> candidacy." For my friends who have hesitation on that score, I'd just ask
>> you to keep four things in mind:
>>
>> * 1.. Justice Scalia just turned 78*
>>
>> * 2.. Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year*
>>
>> * 3.. Justice Breyer will be 76 in August*
>>
>> * 4.. Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about 3 weeks ago.*
>>
>> We wish them all well, of course, but the brute fact is that whoever we
>> elect as President in November is almost certainly going to choose at
>> least one, and maybe more new members of the Supreme Court -- in addition
>> to hundreds of other life-tenured Federal Judges. . . all of whom will be
>> making momentous decisions about our lives for decades to come.
>>
>> It matters whether the guy making those calls is Mitt Romney or Barack
>> Obama. . . NOTHING IS AS IMPORTANT!
>>
>> So for anybody who is thinking of NOT voting because your favorite didn't
>> get nominated, or writing in a candidate who can't win............*
>>
>> *Imagine This:
>>
>> SUPREME COURT JUSTICE: "ERIC HOLDER"
>
> Good point. If the left ever takes over the SC it's over once and for all
> for the rule of law and the constitution. We just think it's bad now..
>
> -Eddie Haskell
>
>
Yeah right..tell us Hasskell just where in the Constitution does it say
or even suggest that spending money is a form of protected speech? If
you knew anything you'd know the founders were very concerned with
accumulating power and guarded against it.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
