XPost: misc.consumers, alt.health, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa   
      
   On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:55:47 -0500, kady  wrote:   
      
   >On 07/10/2012 08:21 PM, Bob F wrote:   
   >> kady wrote:   
   >>>> Quote "Knowing the complexity of the health law, there’s no question   
   >>>> that the IRS is going to struggle with this," said Rep. Charles   
   >>>> Boustany Jr., R-La."   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There's no question that an ignorant republican would struggle with   
   >>>> it. They're not the brightest bulbs on the tree nor does the   
   >>>> elevator go to the top floor!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> All the idiot has to do is learn what Romney did in Massachusetts. It   
   >>>> works fine there.   
   >>>>   
   >>> What is your definition of "works fine?" The plan is blowing a hole in   
   >>> the state budget with cost overruns.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> So, their budget problem doesn't have anything to do with the the Repub   
   created   
   >> collapse of the economy  that is destroying the budget of most other states?   
   >   
   >No. The budget overruns are compared directly to the expected costs and   
   >actual costs.   
   >>   
   >> How are the Repubs working to solve the economic problems. Well, so far,   
   since   
   >> the 2010 elections, the house Repubs have passed or attempted to pass   
   >> legislation to repeal all or part of Obamacare 39 times, none of which had a   
   >> chance of becoming law. And who knows how many laws to restrict womens   
   right to   
   >> choose. Anything but actually works with the Democrats to solve the nations   
   >> problems.   
   >   
   >The responsibility of orchestrating compromise is on the Executive.   
   >Clinton did it with a GOP House led by a *very* confrontative Speaker;   
   >Reagan did it with a Dem House led, again, but a very confrontative   
   >Speaker. The GOP cannot be expected to blindly accept Dem solutions any   
   >more than the Dems were willing to blindly accept them under Bush.   
   >   
   >Or, let me put it another way: Obama's proposals are for shit by any   
   >accepted standard, Hayekian, Keynesian, or Monetarist. (Keynes's ideas   
   >required balanced budgets to work.) They contain a thin veneer of free   
   >market cover to give guys like you some talking points, but at their   
   >core they're just policies for raping capital out of the economy, after   
   >which you leftists all act surprised that GDP is anemic and jobs   
   >recovery is nowhere.   
   >   
   >So, YEA, why should you be surprised that GOP won't go along with   
   >burning the country down? (Especially after we got rid of the friggin'   
   >neocons (who had no problem with big government) and were clueless about   
   >economics.)   
   >>   
   >> They are SOOOOOO against the mandate in ObamaCare, even though they were the   
   >> ones who proposed it in the first place, and pushed it for years against   
   >> Democratic objections, until the Democrats decided thay could accept it to   
   get   
   >> Repub votes on the bill. Suddenly, Repubs hate the idea. They hate every   
   idea   
   >> they ever had that the Democrats have accepted.   
   >   
   >That's WAAAAY too complicated an excuse for the failures of this   
   >Administration. It's far simpler than that.   
   >   
   Wasted breath.  Just call him the loony lefty he is, and be done with it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)