XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politcs.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats
XPost: alt.politics.liberal, alt.politics.obama
From: alley@aohell.com
In article ,
dennism3@dennism3.invalid says...
> > > All Republican politicians claim they're the reincarnation of
Ronald
> > > Reagan.
> > >
> > > Or are you disowning St. Ronnie now?
> >
> > More bullshit libtard lies. Direct me to any videos that any politician
> > claims he's the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan. Thank you.
>
> They all try to rob his grave as it were. Who do think you're kidding.
Direct me to any videos (or audio) that any politician claims he's the
reincarnation of Ronald Reagan. Thank you.
> > Disown Ronnie? No... why would I? Clinton enjoyed 8 great years because
> > of his policies. Don't tell me the good economy was all Billy's doing.
> > (Republican House and Senate) If Obama can blame Bush for his failings,
> > certainly Clinton can blame Reagan and Bush, the elder, for his good
> > fortune.
>
> GHW Bush was just coasting, Clinton's modest tax increase on the wealthy
> and corporations led to the biggest economic boom since WW2. Reagan and
> Bush Sr. had nothing to do with that.
I seriously doubt that Clinton raising taxes on the wealthy, in and of
itself, caused the economy to boom. He had a Republican House and
Senate. I'm sure that Clinton was actually doing THEIR bidding, not the
other way around(he DID compromise a good bit of the time). To say that
Reagan's policies had NO effect, is a little misguided. Were you of an
age from 1980-1988, when you could remember how it was at the time? I
was, so I remember... I didn't just READ about it. Writers can be so
subjective when writing about past Presidencies.
I didn't say GHWB was doing anything really. The point was that policies
were in place prior to Clinton taking office, that didn't just stop once
Clinton took office. It was a different time... raising the taxes on
those making more than $250,000 now, won't put a dent into the economy.
Everyone wants to point out the past when speaking of present
candidate's policies. That shit won't fly. Reaganomics probably won't
work now either. Obama's policies will do more harm than good and R/R's
will hurt short term, but in the long run will do more for recovery than
Obama's. Obama is trying to wreck the economy. I can't see why EVERYONE
doesn't see this.
> Also I would point out Ronald Reagan wouldn't even survive a Republican
> primary in 2012 as crazy and radical as the tea-publican party has
> become. Gives you a warm and fuzzy feeling doesn't it.
I'm sure Reagan would do just fine, especially in his younger years...
he was quite formidable in his salad days.
I don't know where you get "crazy and radical" from... what I see, if I
ever see them, is a bunch of fiscally prudent people, not really into
"crazy". I get all warm and fuzzy when I see Obama's supporters... the
Occupy Wall Street crowds. Anarchists and the drugged out
disenfranchised... even under Obama. Reagan would have called the
National Guard, swept those long-hairs into the gutters, gotten out the
fire hoses and gone to town. No more problem.
> > And while I'm at it... he didn't just get blow jobs in the Oval
> > Office... he got blow jobs in MY Oval Office. I paid for that carpet AND
> > carpet cleaning. LOL
>
> pffft. If you think no president besides Clinton (before and after) has
> ever had a sexual encounter in "YOUR" Oval Office (and not necessarily
> with his wife) you're more naive than I thought.
Pffft? I'm thinking the only other President(s) to have been "accused"
of getting sexual favors in the Oval office, were other Democrats.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
