XPost: misc.legal, alt.politics.elections, alt.politics.democrats.d
XPost: alt.true-crime
From: RAL@hotmail.com
"Bill Graham" wrote in message
news:puadnf-YwZW8ZcjNnZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>>> As for Keynesian economics vs. "supply side" (aka, "trickle down" or
>>> "declare war on the middle class and reward the wealthy political
>>> donors"), the USA has tried both approaches. In every case,
>>> Keynesian economics had to be employed to rescue the US out of a
>>> mess caused by "supply side." It happened in 1933, 1993 and in 2009.
>>
>> What the government should do is only spend the money it has.
>> Sadly, I don't know of any administration that has done this in over
>> 50 years.
>
> ...And its getting worse. Much worse, in just the last few years. bush was
> bad enough, but Obama has taken it to a whole different level. The bigger
> our debt, the greater the percentage of our tax dollars goes to paying off
(1) Have you ever considered getting a dancing horse, even one that would
serve a glue factory better, just so you could write off all kinds of horse
crap? That's what the Tax Cheat in Chief did. And just once, did you EVER
consider why a zillionaire with show horses and elevators in his home for
his many Cadillacs pays only 11% income tax while you, as a good and loyal
American, pay three times his rate? It's not a matter of jealousy. It's a
matter of anger management why the 99%ers needs to be punished and the
1%ers need to be rewarded.
(2) Have you seen any benefit from the Bush tax cuts? IOW has making the
rich richer lowered the unemployment rate?
If a below the radar confidence man shielded by other politicians is your
idea for POTUS, it would make sense that you also liked Bush43 and Nixon.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
