Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.internet.wireless    |    Fun with wireless Internet access    |    55,960 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,759 of 55,960    |
|    Dan Purgert to Jeff Liebermann    |
|    Re: What should we care about in a home     |
|    30 Oct 19 11:55:48    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.home.repair       From: dan@djph.net              -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----       Hash: SHA256              ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.comp.os.windows-10.]       Jeff Liebermann wrote:       > On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 19:10:52 -0000 (UTC), Arlen _G_ Holder       ><_arlen.george@halder.edu> wrote:       >       >>What should we care about in a home router to select the best for us?       >       > I don't know. As soon as I find one that I like, either the       > manufacturer replaces it with a piece of junk, or technology advances       > beyond it's capabilities. For example, when 802.11g, I replaced some       > perfectly functional 802.11b routers. When gigabit became       > fashionable, I was replacing perfectly acceptable 10/100 routers. When       > 802.11n arrived, the older 802.11g routers became eWaste. Same with       > 802.11ac, 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6), and maybe the new 24 and 60GHz bands       > once they become standard on TV's and media players.              I'm not sold on ax, or the 24/60GHz stuff. I have enough trouble       dealing with 5 GHz penetration on too-few APs for the building (cheap       customers, of course). It's going to get so much less fun with that       stuff.              > [...]       > So, what should you care about? In order of importance (most to less       > most):       > 1. Uptime (doesn't crash or lock up).       > 2. Continued firmware (security) updates.       > 3. 2.4 and 5GHz bridging. Must operate on 2.4 and 5Ghz at same time.       > 4. Good performance (wi-fi throughput and range, Ethernet speed test       > results (iPerf3).       > 5. Reliability (no bulging caps, overheating, or sensitivity to power       > glitches.              I'm just tacking these on, they're in no particular order:              6. General support from knowledgeable people (e.g. forums, etc.)       7. Ability to handle different load conditions       8. Looks ;)       9. PoE (well, that's kinda optional ... but super nice)                     -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----              iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl25ekQACgkQjhHd8xJ5       ooHZqwgAnkR0vZdebm+kHe/x2aCTgB6Rl9tdQWYMX3RhZKqYddpxQANb0JdE8AYS       QHy90xNFV0Sk8pIR1J/AKz3mbi4E4lszX7NpKUMuEB/NqiBjw0Jf1jT2UzboYe3c       lj4dmC+YT/EfU43JRxvc/kWM/HRWC+SUU4k4LXDNcUhswIQyCBQqixSQ7kTLjay3       miU5/NE+0kfU9ZiCfUuEc96p0quzDW+9XDSylJ4an9woqiwVDDp8X6NA1T6V7wW2       yGA6DzkviCZO5oq0SAlossn8GY+4A6/69HvciZXzM9GN4++EjB39MjBhByUBEm2X       qjBYooMX2CExV953Uh/ihHMsrFYPsw==       =yob1       -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----              --       |_|O|_|       |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert       |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca