home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.internet.wireless      Fun with wireless Internet access      55,960 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 54,759 of 55,960   
   Dan Purgert to Jeff Liebermann   
   Re: What should we care about in a home    
   30 Oct 19 11:55:48   
   
   XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.home.repair   
   From: dan@djph.net   
      
   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----   
   Hash: SHA256   
      
   ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.comp.os.windows-10.]   
   Jeff Liebermann wrote:   
   > On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 19:10:52 -0000 (UTC), Arlen _G_ Holder   
   ><_arlen.george@halder.edu> wrote:   
   >   
   >>What should we care about in a home router to select the best for us?   
   >   
   > I don't know.  As soon as I find one that I like, either the   
   > manufacturer replaces it with a piece of junk, or technology advances   
   > beyond it's capabilities.  For example, when 802.11g, I replaced some   
   > perfectly functional 802.11b routers.  When gigabit became   
   > fashionable, I was replacing perfectly acceptable 10/100 routers. When   
   > 802.11n arrived, the older 802.11g routers became eWaste.  Same with   
   > 802.11ac, 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6), and maybe the new 24 and 60GHz bands   
   > once they become standard on TV's and media players.   
      
   I'm not sold on ax, or the 24/60GHz stuff.  I have enough trouble   
   dealing with 5 GHz penetration on too-few APs for the building (cheap   
   customers, of course).  It's going to get so much less fun with that   
   stuff.   
      
   > [...]   
   > So, what should you care about?  In order of importance (most to less   
   > most):   
   > 1.  Uptime (doesn't crash or lock up).   
   > 2.  Continued firmware (security) updates.   
   > 3.  2.4 and 5GHz bridging.  Must operate on 2.4 and 5Ghz at same time.   
   > 4.  Good performance (wi-fi throughput and range, Ethernet speed test   
   > results (iPerf3).   
   > 5.  Reliability (no bulging caps, overheating, or sensitivity to power   
   > glitches.   
      
   I'm just tacking these on, they're in no particular order:   
      
   6. General support from knowledgeable people (e.g. forums, etc.)   
   7. Ability to handle different load conditions   
   8. Looks ;)   
   9. PoE (well, that's kinda optional ... but super nice)   
      
      
   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----   
      
   iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl25ekQACgkQjhHd8xJ5   
   ooHZqwgAnkR0vZdebm+kHe/x2aCTgB6Rl9tdQWYMX3RhZKqYddpxQANb0JdE8AYS   
   QHy90xNFV0Sk8pIR1J/AKz3mbi4E4lszX7NpKUMuEB/NqiBjw0Jf1jT2UzboYe3c   
   lj4dmC+YT/EfU43JRxvc/kWM/HRWC+SUU4k4LXDNcUhswIQyCBQqixSQ7kTLjay3   
   miU5/NE+0kfU9ZiCfUuEc96p0quzDW+9XDSylJ4an9woqiwVDDp8X6NA1T6V7wW2   
   yGA6DzkviCZO5oq0SAlossn8GY+4A6/69HvciZXzM9GN4++EjB39MjBhByUBEm2X   
   qjBYooMX2CExV953Uh/ihHMsrFYPsw==   
   =yob1   
   -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----   
      
   --   
   |_|O|_|   
   |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert   
   |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5  4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca