XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: nospam@nospam.invalid   
      
   In article , sms   
    wrote:   
      
   > Well of course you could take the approach of wildly adding more and   
   > more wireless routers, without knowing where the dead spots actually are   
   > or where there is interference from nearby wireless routers, but that   
   > would be an exceedingly stupid thing to do, so it's not surprising that   
   > nospam would think that this is a good idea.   
      
   i never suggested 'wildly adding more and more routers without knowing   
   where the dead spots actually are'.   
      
   stop lying and trolling.   
      
   what i said was if there's a dead spot, simply add a router for   
   additional coverage and link the two. done.   
      
   a mesh unit is an even better choice but not required.   
      
   you have no clue what you're talking about and you're not fooling   
   anyone.   
      
   >   
   > It's like a car mechanic who wildly replaces components because they   
   > lack the skill or equipment to properly diagnose a problem, i.e. "let's   
   > try replacing your $1500 computer, that might fix the problem, oh, that   
   > didn't work, maybe it's the $2000 catalytic converter, oh that didn't   
   > work, maybe it's this wire that fell off the oxygen sensor, I'll just   
   > push it back on, all fixed, you owe me $3500 for parts and $2000 for labor."   
      
   nope.   
      
   if you want to use a ridiculous car analogy, what you're suggesting is   
   someone downloading a bunch of apps to try to diagnose the car despite   
   not knowing what they're doing, versus taking it to a mechanic and have   
   it properly fixed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)