Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.internet.wireless    |    Fun with wireless Internet access    |    55,960 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 55,329 of 55,960    |
|    Carlos E. R. to Paul    |
|    Re: How did Malibu Media find the exact     |
|    25 Oct 23 15:33:02    |
      XPost: sci.geo.satellite-nav, alt.comp.os.windows-10       From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2023-10-25 13:39, Paul wrote:       > On 10/25/2023 7:11 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:       >       >>       >> Hum. The browser knows the location from the IP. Try Google Maps       >> in a computer with a new web profile or computer user, see how       >> they get your location correct. At least the area.       >>       >       > It's more complicated than that.       >       > The browser can query the "Location Service" on a Windows machine.       >       > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-location-s       rvice-and-privacy-3a8eee0a-5b0b-dc07-eede-2a5ca1c49088       >       > "Microsoft operates a location service that helps determine the       > precise geographic location of your Windows device. The precise       > location of your device allows apps to give you directions, show       > shops and restaurants that are near you, and more.       >       > Many apps and services request location information from your device,       > and the Windows location service gives you control over which apps       > are allowed to access your precise location."       >       > There is a big difference between the "precise" on a Windows Phone       > versus the "precise" on a de-equipped desktop. Using my Ethernet IP, they       > would precisely locate me to the "head office of my ISP".       >              Right :-)                     > My pizza won't be getting here in 30 minutes, so it will be free.       >       > *******       >       > There was an academic paper, claiming location via Ethernet packets,       > to around two city blocks. Which is not "precise" and is not enough       > for legal cases. And that method, required a certain density of probing       > devices, to make the determination. This is a good enough method for       > setting up police road blocks and doing a grid search.              I think they need access to the ISP hardware for doing this, so getting       the help of the ISP would be faster.              >       > With wireless in the picture, the situation could be quite different.       > Both Microsoft and Google have "snarfed" SSIDs. Google was doing       > this, with the Google map car that drives around. Microsoft was doing       > it with the OS, but they have likely stopped doing that, some time ago.       > Microsoft would collect all the SSIDs they could find, on a Wifi, and       > then by comparing all the customers, build a map using that info.       >       > I would guess, without Wifi and without a 4G Dongle, you're pretty safe.       >              True, they can use wifi maps. Still, the external query needs access to       knowing the WiFi... or access to the OS location services.              > However, if you Google on "toronto pizza" then you're in Toronto,       > and if you type in "toronto city hall main phone number", again,       > you're in Toronto. If you type in "Joes Pizza", then that might       > isolate you to a section of Toronto. Enough of these kinds of requests,       > geolocates you (as people are too lazy to go to the other side of Toronto).       >              I don't think the ISPs do this. Facebook, Google... maybe.              > I think on one occasion, they got three of my post-code letters correct.       > But since the info displayed at the bottom of the page, is not their       > actual determination (it's to knock you off the scent), their       > determination could be a lot closer.       >       > Paul              --       Cheers,        Carlos E.R.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca