XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-11   
   From: address@is.invalid   
      
   Chris,   
      
   > Irrelevant to the case. The neighbour was using a service he didn't pay   
   > for and had no right to use it.   
      
   I hope you noticed he took a double-pronged attack approach :   
      
   He claims he's allowed to use whatever enters his home*.   
   Well, it stopped coming thru the wall, so there is nothing he could use   
   anymore.  Case closed.   
      
   * I would like to see him claim so with his gas, water and electricity. :-)   
      
   But the second part is that he somehow seems to demand "payment" for the   
   "loud music" he claims he was subjected to.   I've not seen anything about   
   his audacity of that after-the-fact demand.   
      
   I also have not seen the judge tell the guy to pay for all his time (years?)   
   of leeching.   
      
   And no, I don't enjoy watching court cases (on youtube or otherwise).   
   Sorry.   
      
      
   By the way, if you like stories like that - people claiming all kinds rights   
   from others - you might enjoy https://notalwaysright.com/ .  A warning   
   though : there are also a lot of "feel good" stories in there.  You can just   
   skip them ofcourse. :-)   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)