XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, alt.comp.os.windows-10, comp.mobile.android   
   From: ithinkiam@gmail.com   
      
   J. P. Gilliver  wrote:   
   > On 2025/12/7 11:5:16, Chris wrote:   
   >> J. P. Gilliver  wrote:   
   >>> On 2025/12/6 20:51:53, Chris wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> []   
   >>>   
   >>>> There isn't, as far as I can see, an obligation to *remove* a MAC from the   
   >>>> WPS db if they *never see* the nomap request.   
   >>>   
   >>> []   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm only watching this from the sidelines, as a (not-very-interested)   
   >>> observer.   
   >>>   
   >>> This is the first I've heard of a "nomap request".   
   >>>   
   >>> I'd been assuming Arlen/Marian's addition of "_nomap" to his (B?)SSID   
   >>> _was_ the "request", and was (by its nature) continuous.   
   >>   
   >> Correct. It is the request.   
   >>   
   > In that case, I can't see how they could claim not to have seen it; if   
   > the SSID was in their system before it had the _nomap added, then surely   
   > _with_ the _nomap added, it is a new SSID; the same if they'd _not_ had   
   > it, and thus added it as a new one anyway. In both cases, at the point   
   > they added it, they would see it.   
      
   Not if the SSID is hidden.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)