0c99c137   
   cf3e4c27   
   XPost: alt.music.s-mclachlan, alt.religion.druid   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   On May 26, 2021, David Dalton wrote   
   (in article<0001HW.265E533C00DE19DF70000E72538F@news.eternal-september.org>):   
      
   > Anthropologist Wade Davis is straight-type-2-M and   
   > in the same species as Bill Bourne and Charlotte   
   > Black Elk.   
   >   
   > His wife Gail Percy is straight-type-1 so they   
   > are not compatible except maybe when she   
   > was ovulating, otherwise he would have   
   > ejaculation with no orgasm. But he is a.s.r.   
   > so why didn’t she turn bif in the additional   
   > higher dimensional body edits? And I   
   > intuit they are no longer in the same species   
   > and that she has a good match, a straight-type-1-M   
   > who is not Wade.   
   >   
   > And what about a possible a.s.r. bif match   
   > for Wade? There is a (bald?) woman shaman whose   
   > picture I saw on a Facebook group (perhaps   
   > as the cover picture) who has big open circles   
   > in her earlobes   
      
   I don’t mean hoop earrings but the earlobes   
   stretched around big open circles in the   
   centres of the earlobes.   
      
   > but I can’t find the picture   
   > right now. But anyway his old lock has been   
   > dissolved so he should be able to find a   
   > probably indigenous/shamanic bif by attraction,   
   > but she came to mind. But with the   
   > widened lock he would still be attracted   
   > to non-a.s.r. bifs in his species but wouldn’t   
   > be able to get them,   
      
   But an assisted shaktipat recipient (a.s.r.) who   
   was already involved with an optimally compatible   
   non-a.s.r. before the four normal mood   
   sexuality/romance items line of the assisted shaktipat   
   was transmitted would get to keep that   
   relationship while also being in the widened   
   lock within each species in the group of a.s.r.+me.   
      
   And that would include those formerly partially   
   compatible (and some incompatible since the   
   additional and further higher dimensional body   
   edits preceded the regular ones) relationships   
   involving an a.s.r. and a non-a.s.r. that were   
   made optimally sexually compatible in the   
   additional and further higher dimensional   
   body edits. So for example bif Beyonce (a.s.r.)   
   still has Jay Z (non-a.s.r., has become   
   straight-type-2-M) but she could still have   
   me if she wanted though that is unlikely,   
   whereas a non-a.s.r. bif associated with a   
   non-a.s.r. straight-type-2-M would not be   
   attractive to or attracted to another   
   non-a.s.r. straight-type-2-M.   
      
   But again relationships not meeting the   
   continuous five years and/or child under 16   
   criteria were not made optimally sexually   
   compatible and have been broken up, and   
   I think that includes Joe and Jill Biden as   
   I have discussed before (so they must have   
   had a temporary breakup within the last five years).   
   But Joe does not now have negative charisma modulation.   
   See past threads for matches for them.   
      
   > so she would have   
   > to be an a.s.r. bif in his species. Anyway,   
   > Jonathan Davis, Admin of the Facebook group   
   > Visionary Mental Health (formerly   
   > The Shamanic View of Mental Illness)   
   > would probably know of the woman I   
   > am thinking of.   
      
   --   
   David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)   
   https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)   
   “And the cart is on a wheel/And the wheel is on a hill/And the hill is   
   shifting sand/And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)