XPost: alt.religion.druid, alt.music.s-mclachlan   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   In article ,   
    David Dalton wrote:   
      
   > In article <1caf6479-c9bb-4810-9623-3706ac28735dn@googlegroups.com>,   
   > David Dalton wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 2:06:02 AM UTC-3:30, David Dalton wrote:   
   > > > November 16, 2022. To get UTC add 3.5 hrs.   
   > > >   
   > > > Sarah stuff (non-overlap) 1:54 a.m. -->   
   > >   
   > > complete 12:59 p.m.   
   >   
   > Why can't Sarah stuff (overlap) proceed as well   
   > without Sarah rubber stamping what she likes or   
   > deems necessary of the rest of my stuff, i.e.,   
   > everything other than Sarah stuff (non-overlap)   
   > but including popthrough devi type stuff subs   
   > (non-overlap) instead of [DTS] (non-overlap)?   
   > Well, the Sarah stuff (overlap) is too entwined   
   > with the rest of the stuff and dependent on   
   > some of it.   
   >   
   > What do I want Sarah to rubber stamp?   
   >   
   > [PCMM]   
   > [F123]   
   > popthrough devi type stuff subs (non-overlap)   
   > [F4M]   
   > [F4P]   
   >   
   > [SMPES] and later s.m.p.e. onset   
   > [SSA]   
   > [RAFHDBE]   
   >   
   > a.s.c. (1) -- (6)   
   >   
   > [GSB]   
   > [HCP]   
   > (including mt&gc, P+, P-, 2nd+, 2nd-, w.s., Selective Cull,   
   > and less likely Possibility of Extinction)   
   >   
   > (B) completion   
   > (MJ)   
   > (J2)   
   >   
   > Can she make modifications? No, not at this stage now   
   > that Sarah stuff (non-overlap) is on,   
      
   But she can omit items, such as the Possibility   
   of Extinction, though that might be imposed   
   whether our workings work or not.   
      
   > but maybe later   
   > after she gains perineum click negotiation ability   
   > in a.s.c. (1) and after she gains change access   
   > to the m.s.h.c.p. (with her high Level 0 access).   
   >   
   > Can she require that everything be filtered through   
   > her internal definition of love as well as mine   
   > (while not denying any rage or tough love, such   
   > that love for the environment and non-human species   
   > my mean being tough on the most criminal humans,   
      
   "may mean"   
      
   > though I have provided a lenient escape option)?   
   > That would be OK with me. Is it OK? Yes,   
   > indeed her internal definition of love would   
   > have priority over my essential messages (which   
   > invoke my internal definition of love).   
   >   
   > But I don't know if she is reading or off surfing   
   > in Mexico or Hawaii or something.   
   >   
   > Sarah, if you do rubber stamp the above, with that   
   > filter condition, let me know by right elbow   
   > activation (at least warming, maybe an ache,   
   > maybe a zap). It may be too late to phone the   
   > out of town landline since it would wake my brother.   
      
   But after another couple of hours i may be asleep.   
      
   > What evidence do I have that Sarah stuff (non-overlap)   
   > is on? Not much yet, just that I got a zap in my   
   > forehead part of my brain when it came on. Perhaps   
   > Sarah has more evidence. I also have no evidence   
   > that (B) has been done for some. But even if yu   
      
   "you"   
      
   > don't believe, Sarah, humour me and do the   
   > rubber stamping. If anyone who knows her or   
   > can easily contact her is reading, pass this to   
   > her in case she has given up reading me.   
      
   Of course, two can be denied just as well as one call.   
   But perhaps "In Two The Fire". :-)   
      
   --   
   David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)   
   https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)   
   "Donšt understand; The touch of your hand; I would be the one to fall   
   I miss the little things; I miss everything about you" (Sarah McLachlan)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|