7073fa48   
   781fe860   
   XPost: alt.religion.druid, alt.traditional.witchcraft, alt.religion.shamanism   
   XPost: alt.native, talk.religion.newage   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   On Dec 1, 2024, David Dalton wrote   
   (in article<0001HW.2CFD52520044F81A700002F0338F@news.eternal-september.org>):   
      
   > On Dec 1, 2024, David Dalton wrote   
   > (in article<0001HW.2CFC2F100003E47A700002F0338F@news.eternal-september.org>):   
   >   
   > > I am attempting to facilitate a global binding of criminals which   
   > > should be in place within a few days, so some time in early   
   > > waxing crescent moon, though criminals may have a guilty   
   > > conscience well before then .   
   > >   
   > > Here is a relevant paragraph from talk.politics.misc:   
   > >   
   > > Of relevance to talk.politics.misc, 62% of country leaders   
   > > are medium criminal or worse as defined by Goddess (who   
   > > I define as the ruler of the region all/everything, and who   
   > > many call God) and will have certain healing circle (also   
   > > known as sentencing circle) prescriptions to follow if they   
   > > wish to get the extended lifespan benefits of the sudden   
   > > magickal physical evolution (and to avoid death relatively   
   > > soon if they are major or extreme criminal).   
   >   
   > Some notes from alt.atheism :   
   >   
   > Goodness levels are defined by Goddess.   
   >   
   > Note that years ago I attempted to constrain a nebulous   
   > “the definition of goodness” to my essential messages (which   
   > are on my mystic page), UN law (and there is no conflict   
   > between International Court of Justice law and International   
   > Criminal Court law), Canadian law, Newfoundland and Labrador   
   > law, St. John’s bylaws, and Harbour Main--Chapel’s Cove-Lakeview   
   > bylaws, in that priority. Later I converted that constraining into   
   > a suggestion for Goddess. However I do not know if that   
   > suggestion affected Goddess’s definition of goodness.   
      
   Also the constraining (and suggestion) was for both a   
   multicomponent goodness and an overall goodness measure.   
      
   The multicomponent goodness is the goodness of each someone   
   or something that is not a someone towards itself and each other   
   someone or something that is not a someone.   
      
   The goodness measure is an overall measure of goodness.   
   I used to say goodness norm, nut a norm is generally   
   always positive, whereas a goodness measure can be   
   either positive, neutral, or negative.   
      
   One example of a goodness measure would be the   
   goodness towards all/everything, but I do not know   
   if that is how Goddess defines it. Another would   
   be the goodness towards Goddess. (But of course   
   if all/everything is a someone ALL then it obviously   
   governs itself and in that case Goddess would be   
   the same as ALL, but I don’t know if that is the case.)   
      
   And someone can be very good in most areas and bad   
   in one area yet have a negative goodness measure.   
   An example might be a priest who is generally very   
   good but has sexually abused one child, who would   
   be at least the mild end of major criminal. (Whereas   
   someone who has raped an adult violently would   
   be at the worse end of medium criminal.)   
      
   --   
   David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)   
   https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)   
   “And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill; And the   
   hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand” (Ferron)   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)