From: B00ze64@hotmail.com   
      
   On 2018-06-08 03:56, Auric__  wrote:   
      
   > markovicb599 wrote:   
   >   
   >> .cmd extension is for 64-bit.   
   >> .bat extension is for 32-bit.   
   >   
   > [BZZT] Oh, so sorry, wrong answer. Thanks for playing, try our home game   
   > instead.   
   >   
   > cmd comes from OS/2, a 32-bit system. 32-bit Windows has no problem running   
   > them. bat comes from DOS, a 16-bit system. 64-bit Windows has no problem   
   > running them.   
      
   Aren't we supposed to use CMD ever since WinNT? I use CMD for anything   
   that runs in Windows, rather than in real DOS (where I use BAT.)   
   According to the following, there ARE differences between using CMD/BAT   
   for file-extension even tho you run both with cmd.exe:   
      
   https://stackoverflow.com/questions/148968/windows-batch-files-bat-vs-cmd   
      
   Regards,   
      
   --   
   ! _\|/_  Sylvain / B00ze64@hotmail.com   
   ! (o o)   Member:David-Suzuki-Fdn/EFF/Red+Cross/SPCA/Planetary-Society   
   oO-( )-Oo  You think I care which way you face? -O'Brien   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)