From: fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com   
      
   Herbert Kleebauer wrote:   
   >   
   > Then you have the same problem: the first %random% isn't   
   > random. So better insert a "dummy=%random% at the start of   
   > the batch.   
      
   In an earlier version it saved a log with a graph output to show the   
   pattern. It revealed that the second number wasn't very random either.   
      
      
   --   
   Defund the Thought Police   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)