Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.msdos.batch    |    Fun with MS-DOS batch files    |    42,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,739 of 42,547    |
|    Anton Shepelev to All    |
|    Re: Turing-competeness of the batch lang    |
|    28 Aug 19 00:06:47    |
      From: anton.txt@gmail.com              Herbert Kleebauer:              > > for %%i in (*.txt) do call set list=%%list%%,%%i       >       > When the line is parsed, %% is replaced by %, so       > it becomes:       >       > call set list=%list%,%%i              That explains it, but what about the %%i? I never       understood why the FOR counter must be specified       with % on the command line and with %% in a batch       file, whereas other command (e.g. echo %PATH%) work       identically. Again, the FOR documentation communi-       cates the fact but gives no explanation.              --       () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail       /\ http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca