XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10   
   From: this@address.is.invalid   
      
   On 21-03-2023 17:08 Newyana2  wrote:   
      
   >   Exactly. Privacy is not philosophy. It's a practical   
   > matter. You may want to randomize your fonts, but others   
   > have a right to know it's not a useful thing to do.   
      
   I think you understand privacy and you must understand that I do too.   
   I never said there was only one way to approach anti fingerprinting.   
      
   Each method has its pros and cons, where randomizing the fonts has a large   
   advantage that it doesn't break the Internet & it works for all browsers.   
      
   It should also be zero maintenance (or close to zero) over a span of years.   
      
   If I had never mentioned why I want to randomize the "stuff" in a   
   directory, the question would still be the same, privacy or not.   
      
   How can someone randomize stuff in a Windows directory anyway?   
   That's the question.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)