home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.music.bluegrass      Cotton-pickin twangy southern goodness      2,344 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,586 of 2,344   
   Cathy Cowette to William Sommerwerck   
   Re: violin vs. fiddle   
   12 Oct 06 15:41:03   
   
   XPost: rec.music.classical.recordings, rec.music.makers.bowed-strings   
   From: cathy@cathycowette.com   
      
   "William Sommerwerck"  wrote in message   
   news:ca6dnRQSvvEAvbPYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com...   
   > There is no difference. But a "fiddler" would generally play without   
   > vibrato   
   > ("white"), while a "violinist" would use vibrato.   
   >   
   > I don't want to get into a discussion of whether pre-Romantic violinists   
   > used vibrato, or the reasons for its introduction.   
   >   
   That would depend on what type of tune the fiddler was playing. For   
   instance, on a waltz, a good fiddler uses plenty of vibrato.   
   The main difference between a violin and fiddle is musical style. Fiddling   
   involves a lot of shuffling between strings. It's a technique that's quite a   
   chore to learn.   
   Structural difference: A fiddle and a violin is the same instrument. Many   
   fiddlers  go for older instruments... 100, 200 years old.   
   There are also plenty of good handmade fiddles around.   
   And, a fiddle has a flattened bridge. There's less of an arch, to facilitate   
   drone strings and double stops.   
      
   Cathy   
   http://www.cathycowette.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca