home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.music.bluegrass      Cotton-pickin twangy southern goodness      2,344 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,898 of 2,344   
   MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk to All   
   MI5 Persecution: tinker tailor wanker th   
   17 Nov 07 17:54:21   
   
   XPost: se.politik.diverse, ucb.class.cs61a, sci.engr.civil   
   XPost: alt.lifestyle.all-faiths   
      
   Crescent Grove, Clapham Common (2/Dec/2000)   
      
   Certainty level: 100%   
      
   This is one of those clips where I am absolutely, 100% certain it's   
   inflicted by MI5 on me, because of background, context. On Saturday   
   2 December 2000, I was walking from my home to a pub on Clapham Common,   
   and on the way was in proximity to a group of three English youths   
   who were walking the other way. They turned from the main road into a   
   private estate called Crescent Grove. Here is what they said;   
      
   (first youth) "He masturbates!"   
   (his mate responds) "Yeah, he masturbates!"   
   (and again) "Thief!"   
      
   There is a lot of context associated with this incident, which I will now   
   relate.   
      
   Firstly, the verbal sexual abuse is a popular one with MI5, and as a statement   
   about me is currently mostly in their imaginations. The accusation has to be   
   seen   
   relative to MI5's persecutory actions in late November and early December 2000,   
   and in fact for some months leading up to this. Their relevant activities in   
   June 2000 are documented in a message in this evidence item;   
   following from that, they sent someone to simulate an act in front of my   
   window,   
   which was captured on film.   
      
   It is the publication of the video of their agent performing the act on himself   
   which caused MI5 to restart this thread of harassment in the first few days of   
   December 2000. But there are some subtleties; I uploaded the digitised video   
   to this website on 26/November/2000; but I did not announce its existence on   
   the   
   newsgroups until Sunday 3/December/2000. These youths' slur was made the   
   previous   
   day, on Saturday 2/Dec. That tells us quite a lot. According to my website   
   logs,   
   there were no accesses to the video file before Sunday 3/Dec. So why did MI5   
   restart   
   this particular thread of abuse, before their agent's activities were   
   published on the newsgroup? The conclusion we reach is that they were watching   
   my   
   internet connection, either decoding the telephone line, or at the ISP; and/or   
   they   
   may be able to physically see what is on my notebook computer's screen, from   
   RF transmissions from its VGA circuitry. I do not know whether the latter is   
   technically feasible, but the former certainly is, and I have known for years   
   that MI5 bugs my internet activities and phone calls. It is from their   
   observation   
   of my internet connection that they were able to tell, without accessing the   
   video file over the net, that it was of their agent in a compromising position;   
   and it was from that observation that their shouted slur on 2/Dec emanates.   
      
   The second accusation, "Thief!", is even more interesting. It relates to   
   occurrences   
   from June of 2000, some six months before these youths threw the word at me.   
   It shows   
   just how wide in reach geographically and temporally the MI5 persecution is;   
   they react to something which happened half a year previously.   
      
   In the first half of 2000, MI5 made a determined assault on my friendships. In   
   one   
   particular case, that of A. whom I had known for virtually all my life, they   
   partly   
   succeeded. This person made pointed references to me which made it clear he   
   knew   
   what was happening; at one point he started asking "do you know anything about   
   the   
   FBI and the CIA". In June 2000, we went to see a film in the West End. I paid   
   for   
   both of us, and then asked him to return what I had paid for his ticket, some   
   £7.50.   
   He was reluctant to do so. Eventually he returned £5, settling for the lesser   
   gain of £2.50.   
      
   I did not call him a thief to his face, but I may have spoken the word while I   
   was   
   at home, either conscious or in my sleep. MI5 have very tight control over   
   everything   
   I do and say in my home through their bugs; if I say anything against someone   
   in   
   "their" camp, they turn round the accusation against me. So, from the fact   
   that A.   
   tried to garner a few pounds at my expense, MI5 create the accusation, six   
   months   
   later..... "thief!".   
      
   19978   
      
      
   --   
   Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service   
         ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------   
   Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca