Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.bluegrass    |    Cotton-pickin twangy southern goodness    |    2,344 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,898 of 2,344    |
|    MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk to All    |
|    MI5 Persecution: tinker tailor wanker th    |
|    17 Nov 07 17:54:21    |
      XPost: se.politik.diverse, ucb.class.cs61a, sci.engr.civil       XPost: alt.lifestyle.all-faiths              Crescent Grove, Clapham Common (2/Dec/2000)              Certainty level: 100%              This is one of those clips where I am absolutely, 100% certain it's       inflicted by MI5 on me, because of background, context. On Saturday       2 December 2000, I was walking from my home to a pub on Clapham Common,       and on the way was in proximity to a group of three English youths       who were walking the other way. They turned from the main road into a       private estate called Crescent Grove. Here is what they said;              (first youth) "He masturbates!"       (his mate responds) "Yeah, he masturbates!"       (and again) "Thief!"              There is a lot of context associated with this incident, which I will now       relate.              Firstly, the verbal sexual abuse is a popular one with MI5, and as a statement       about me is currently mostly in their imaginations. The accusation has to be       seen       relative to MI5's persecutory actions in late November and early December 2000,       and in fact for some months leading up to this. Their relevant activities in       June 2000 are documented in a message in this evidence item;       following from that, they sent someone to simulate an act in front of my       window,       which was captured on film.              It is the publication of the video of their agent performing the act on himself       which caused MI5 to restart this thread of harassment in the first few days of       December 2000. But there are some subtleties; I uploaded the digitised video       to this website on 26/November/2000; but I did not announce its existence on       the       newsgroups until Sunday 3/December/2000. These youths' slur was made the       previous       day, on Saturday 2/Dec. That tells us quite a lot. According to my website       logs,       there were no accesses to the video file before Sunday 3/Dec. So why did MI5       restart       this particular thread of abuse, before their agent's activities were       published on the newsgroup? The conclusion we reach is that they were watching       my       internet connection, either decoding the telephone line, or at the ISP; and/or       they       may be able to physically see what is on my notebook computer's screen, from       RF transmissions from its VGA circuitry. I do not know whether the latter is       technically feasible, but the former certainly is, and I have known for years       that MI5 bugs my internet activities and phone calls. It is from their       observation       of my internet connection that they were able to tell, without accessing the       video file over the net, that it was of their agent in a compromising position;       and it was from that observation that their shouted slur on 2/Dec emanates.              The second accusation, "Thief!", is even more interesting. It relates to       occurrences       from June of 2000, some six months before these youths threw the word at me.       It shows       just how wide in reach geographically and temporally the MI5 persecution is;       they react to something which happened half a year previously.              In the first half of 2000, MI5 made a determined assault on my friendships. In       one       particular case, that of A. whom I had known for virtually all my life, they       partly       succeeded. This person made pointed references to me which made it clear he       knew       what was happening; at one point he started asking "do you know anything about       the       FBI and the CIA". In June 2000, we went to see a film in the West End. I paid       for       both of us, and then asked him to return what I had paid for his ticket, some       £7.50.       He was reluctant to do so. Eventually he returned £5, settling for the lesser       gain of £2.50.              I did not call him a thief to his face, but I may have spoken the word while I       was       at home, either conscious or in my sleep. MI5 have very tight control over       everything       I do and say in my home through their bugs; if I say anything against someone       in       "their" camp, they turn round the accusation against me. So, from the fact       that A.       tried to garner a few pounds at my expense, MI5 create the accusation, six       months       later..... "thief!".              19978                     --       Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service        ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------       Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca