XPost: rec.music.bluenote, rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz   
   From: jcmartin@sonic.net   
      
   j_nscott@msn.com wrote:   
      
   > Look at that "something that... pleases" (entertainment) and "the   
   > production of the beautiful" (art). The production of the beautiful   
   > pleases whoever thinks it's beautiful, so all art is pleasing to   
   > someone, so all art is entertainment.   
   >   
   > The definitions I looked at didn't say anything about a "free market."   
      
      
   Interesting Mr. Scott how you're out here defending a troll, using odd   
   snipping techniques and taking aspects of different definitions and   
   extrapolating out of it your own biased view rather than honestly   
   looking at the definition.  Art indeed can be entertainment.  But it   
   doesn't need to entertain to exist nor the does human impulse to create   
   art exist solely as a need to entertain.  Get a real dictionary and try   
   to isolate each definition.  Read a few history books on art and then   
   get back to me.   
      
   Virtually yours,   
   JC   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)