Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.makers.soloact    |    The fun of being a one-man-band    |    1,456 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,027 of 1,456    |
|    Ouisie to JimD    |
|    Re: small insight    |
|    18 May 18 19:26:18    |
      From: someone@anywheret.net              "JimD" wrote in message news:2018051600323450290-email@nowherecom...              > A long time ago, when we were young, there was something that puzzled us.       > It was, where are the " middle " level bands ? We were out there touring,       > we were opening for the big names. We bought records, listened to and       > studied everyone. We knew how " good " we were, as in what our limits       > were. We could see the famous bands, often up close, and understood pretty       > much how good they were.              HOW were they all that 'good'...particularly when compared to your band?              > We saw our shortcomings. We felt we weren't as good as the big boys.              What shortcomings?              > The famous bands looked flawless to us .              How so?              > So that brought up a puzzle. Where were the bands that would be better       > than us, but not as good as the famous guys ?              And WHAT was it that made some of them 'better', and others 'not as good'?              > We never saw those people. We saw less than perfect us, and we saw the       > perfect pros.              Or could it be something as simple as what you saw was *apparent* confidence       ascribed to those so-called 'perfect pros', merely because they got some       better breaks than those *apparently* 'not as good', because they didn't get       the breaks they needed and were thus *apparently* had less confidence       ascribed to them?              > What I realize now is that, with a few rare exceptions, we actually were       > as good as the pro's. And that proved itself out over time as we grew up       > and worked with the big names. Once you actually do that, you realize how       > it all works.              As in, you get to see through all the smokescreens ;)              > Being good enough to be a pro is doable by most people.              Absolutely - it's what I'm after!              > Being super famous, on the other hand is a lot of hard work, AND a huge       > amount of luck.              And particularly being Innovative and Creative in writing and performing       Brand New Awesome FRESH material!!!              > All that said, a band doesn't have to be ALL great players. Often one or       > two can carry the rest. As long as the rest aren't so bad they make a       > hopeless mess of everything.              The idea of 'carrying' lesser band members is the root of the problem!              > In my younger more arrogant days, I often said of my band, particularly on       > fiddle tunes, that they don't have to actually know the songs perfectly,       > as long as they don't trip me,              Oh, no! Sounds like a recipe for disaster ;)              > I'll carry the thing and it'll be great.              A Horrible situation...because that's Exactly what will end up happening,       and you'll end up being Drained like a Vampire's Victim!              > That basic idea still applies, as we often do songs someone in the band       > doesn't actually know.              OUCH!!! I hope that at least that's only a temporary condition until the       songs are known!              > Or drummer isn't really a " country " guy.              I'm a hippie rock & roller but I have no problem doing 'country' too...and       church tunes too.              > Doesn't like the music, never listened to it. So if we do some song that       > isn't a straight 4/4 rock thing, he's just as likely as not to wreck the       > thing.              That's not a very mature attitude on his part. With no previous history of       church songs, I'm learning a lot of worship songs because I wanted to expand       my horizons, and as a result, I'm actually getting to know more and more of       them.              > That often keeps us from trying songs, particularly requests that we could       > play.              Yep, all thanks to narrow mindedness.              > ramble, ramble ... gotta run Google is sending me some security warnings I       > gotta read and figure out.              Jim              Whatever that means.              Ouisie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca