Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.makers.soloact    |    The fun of being a one-man-band    |    1,456 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,182 of 1,456    |
|    Ouisie to JimD    |
|    Re: midi guitar thoughts    |
|    13 Oct 18 05:48:18    |
      From: someone@anywheret.net              "JimD" wrote in message news:2018101019035347051-email@nowherecom...              > I like your mindset. Optimistic, far beyond what's actually possible with       > current technology. That's fine.              Then it's time for the currently technology to Evolve.              > There's a truism, something like, if you want to know what's actually       > possible today, ask an engineer. If you want to know what's in the future,       > those same engineers can't help you.              That depends on the engineer - because *some* of them are into inventing       things!              > See, engineers know what they can actually do, they've done it.              I was also into research and development, so thinking beyond limitations was       a constant practice too, because inventing an Improvement is the next step,       and obviously something we need.              > So they know what's actually doable. If those same enginners tell you       > something isn't possible ... they can be ignored. They don't what might       > be possible in the future.              Those kinds of engineers are as Stagnant as those who are into STALE Music,       but I prefer FRESH!              > I can tell you that, as of now, what you're talking about isn't doable       > with any publically available code. Maybe some classified black budget       > government program can, but then we wouldn't know that, as it would be       > secret / calassified.              Unfortunately, I'm not working much with midi, much less midi development,       but if I was, I'd be going for Improvements and Enhancements so that it can       *accurately*, at least insomuch as digital is able to be accurate, ALL       instruments, not only keyboards.              > It's not an interface. It's a communication protocal, that includes a spec       > for the hardware interface.              Yes, I know, it's the 'language' that makes the hardware work on a Practical       basis...which means that Better language will enhance the interface!              > Midi won't be developed any further. That boat sailed years ago.       > Technology has moved beyond midi, so no point in developing it. It's 7       > bit, old, slow and crappy on a hardware level.              I've often thought of it as sort of a 'concept', as if to say; "look at       *some* of the things that *could* be done...so now it's time for the next       step, of Finally Realizing those ALL things Practically, by Evolving the       technology...from a mere TOY, so something Truly PRACTICAL!              > Unliklely, but who knows, maybe .....              Since it HAS to expand, it MUST!              > The midi harware spec is gone, history. It was a current loop mess. Now,       > most midi hardware is serial USB. That was a move forward.              Now if only it can *easily* be adapted to the DIN plug midi       connections...because that's the problem with my Casio CDP-130 - all it has       is a USB connection and to 'adapt' it to existing midi equipment, there's a       $150 interface and that Sucks!              > Updating the language itself would take some cooperation between       > companies, or somebody developing a much better layer on top of midi. It's       > been tried several times, and died. No enough interest.              That's because the Root of ALL Evil RUINS everything!!!              I'd rather see it go the way of Linux - lots of Gift Economy mentality       behind it, then it WILL happen...totally open source code, and totally       Free...and 'hackers' constantly improving it...now That's       Progress...something that's KILLED when Filthy Lucre becomes involved!              > I see more likley improved signal processing that operates on the the       > audio output of normal instruments.              JimD              Of course, but there still must be some kind of transducer for that.              Ouisie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca