Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.makers.soloact    |    The fun of being a one-man-band    |    1,456 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,282 of 1,456    |
|    Ouisie to Jim D    |
|    Re: on wifi controllable mixers    |
|    31 Dec 18 14:24:52    |
      From: someone@anywheret.net              "Jim D" wrote in message news:2018123112084931399-Not@ThisAddresscom...              > What they did seems reasonable. Put in a basic wifi system, allow for       > better if necessary. Not everyone plays large gigs. In my solo / duo work       > I've not had any problem at all with the built in wifi. It's only on       > larger jobs that's an issue.              In that case, their top of the line X-Air mixer should have nothing but       robust wifi.              > So, should Beh have added about $300 to the price to put in a really good       > router that, lets be honest, most of their customers would never have       > needed ?              Behringer is pretty good about keeping things affordable.              > Current wifi doesn't allow that. The radio in the beh pretty much has to       > accepting incoming signals before it can know which ones to act on.              Or respond, i.e. 'switch on' only when there's a code that indicates an       authorized connection              > Or maybe it would if I could set it to not send SSID out. Of course then       > we would have to jump more hoops to get our own connections. Maybe that's       > doable, I'll look into it when there is time.              Maybe some kind of passcode to turn the feature on in the first place. I'm       sure Behringer's engineers can figure it out.              > Don't, and didn't have any. The difference in my very uninformed view is       > that that processor in the Cisco that decides whether an incoming signal       > is something to use or ignore is far more capable. In other words it can       > handle screening out the junk signals better.              Cool, now Behringer can replace the lame system with a robust one like that.              > Or maybe it's the dual band nature of it that helps. When 2.4 ghz is       > clogged, it looks at the 5 ghz band channel and uses that. In fact,       > that's what my wifi analyzer seems to show. My pad are connecting to the       > mixer in the far less used 5 ghz band.              > In any case, it's working.                     JimD              That's what matters.              Ouisie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca