home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.music.makers.soloact      The fun of being a one-man-band      1,456 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,282 of 1,456   
   Ouisie to Jim D   
   Re: on wifi controllable mixers   
   31 Dec 18 14:24:52   
   
   From: someone@anywheret.net   
      
   "Jim D"  wrote in message news:2018123112084931399-Not@ThisAddresscom...   
      
   > What they did seems reasonable. Put in a basic wifi system, allow for   
   > better if necessary. Not everyone plays large gigs.  In my solo / duo work   
   > I've not had any problem at all with the built in wifi. It's only on   
   > larger jobs that's an issue.   
      
   In that case, their top of the line X-Air mixer should have nothing but   
   robust wifi.   
      
   > So, should Beh have added about $300 to the price to put in a really good   
   > router that, lets be honest, most of their customers would never have   
   > needed ?   
      
   Behringer is pretty good about keeping things affordable.   
      
   > Current wifi doesn't allow that. The radio in the beh pretty much has to   
   > accepting incoming signals before it can know which ones to act on.   
      
   Or respond, i.e. 'switch on' only when there's a code that indicates an   
   authorized connection   
      
   > Or maybe it would if I could set it to not send SSID out.  Of course then   
   > we would have to jump more hoops to get our own connections. Maybe that's   
   > doable, I'll look into it when there is time.   
      
   Maybe some kind of passcode to turn the feature on in the first place. I'm   
   sure Behringer's engineers can figure it out.   
      
   > Don't, and didn't have any.  The difference in my very uninformed view is   
   > that that processor in the Cisco that decides whether an incoming signal   
   > is something to use or ignore is far more capable. In other words it can   
   > handle screening out the junk signals better.   
      
   Cool, now Behringer can replace the lame system with a robust one like that.   
      
   > Or maybe it's the dual band nature of it that helps. When 2.4 ghz is   
   > clogged, it looks at the 5 ghz band channel and uses that.  In fact,   
   > that's what my wifi analyzer seems to show. My pad are connecting to the   
   > mixer in the far less used 5 ghz band.   
      
   > In any case, it's working.   
      
      
   JimD   
      
   That's what matters.   
      
   Ouisie   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca