From: someone@anywheret.net   
      
   "Jim D"  wrote in message news:2019010114372525908-Not@ThisAddresscom...   
      
   > yes, and that is why they can put in a more capable wifi system.  Plus,   
   > the x32 would typically be used in larger venues, more iphones .. so this   
   > matters there. The smaller digitals, the x12, x16 or even the x18 might be   
   > more often used by solos or small bands, and so less iphones in the   
   > audence, not a problem   
      
   The X32 is the loaded one, wouldn't mind using one myself.   
      
   > yes, but beside the point   
      
   Not really, because less GREEEEED is what makes things more affordable,   
   otherwise it gets priced out of range.   
      
   > again, the system has to listen and capture the codes before it can decide   
   > whether to act on them.  Only one channel at a time .... it's not like it   
   > can tune in on JUST the radio in my pad.  It hears everything on the wifi   
   > channel its on. Then it takes processing power to decide what to act on.   
   > Wifi ( 2.4 ghz ) has about 11 channels, btw. But still you have to pick   
   > one.   
      
   All it has to do is respond to one code, not analyze them all, sort of like   
   an infrared remote controller...THAT kind of system is what's needed.   
      
   > Better maybe, but that's not possible with how wifi works.   Read up on   
   > this, you'll understand a lot better that way.   
      
   If the current configuration doesn't suffice, then Change it to something   
   that does!   
      
   > They will.  I like the mixer.  I'd buy another in a heartbeat.   
      
   JimD   
      
   They're Awesome, I wouldn't mind having one!   
      
   Ouisie   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)