Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.makers.soloact    |    The fun of being a one-man-band    |    1,456 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 487 of 1,456    |
|    Ouisie to JimD    |
|    Re: working on some of our own tunes ton    |
|    08 Mar 17 13:16:04    |
      From: someone@anywheret.net              "JimD" wrote in message news:2017030811123916782-email@nowherecom...              > What don't I like ? Nothing in particular. Other than I do know a little       > about the tastes of ****** OUR ******** audiences.              Then it's a matter of preferences. I can dig that.              > What are your thoughts on the Buckeroos version of Up On Cripple Creek ?              I like it! I'm more familiar with the version by The Band, but the Buckeroos       sure do their version close, and I'd have no problem doing that one! But of       course, to me, that's more rock & roll, so it's not Real Country ;)       I'm kind of a 'purist' about that too - Real Country is from the 1960s and       before ;)              > And, I gave you an easy one there. You can look that song up on youtube.              I just did.              > But how about the Strangers version of Champaign ? There's a song our       > audiences would know.              With Merle Haggard, it's a nice instrumental tune, and not very long - but       that can always be extended, I wouldn't mind playing along, I could get into       it.              > Or Gary T.....'s recording about of Could have been Nashville ?              Couldn't find a Gary T, but did find a Gary Stewart doing a tune called       "let's Go Jukein' On Nashville Now".       Wouldn't mind doing that tune either - nice piano parts.       Was that the tune?              Once again, it's kind of a pseudo postcountry, what might be called       'alternative' 'country' i.e. Not Real Country.              But I'd also have no problem playing the Real Country tunes from the '60s       and before.              > See, my point is, we live in our musical world. I don't do, or care what       > the current pop craze is.              I couldn't care about that either, because I like tunes on their own merits,       and that's all that matters.              > Crazy, I know, but that's how it is.              No, it's about preferences - nothing wrong, or crazy, with that.              > Yesterday I had a discussion re: Chicago Polka style vs Pittsburg.       > Chicago being typical of Little Wally, or later Eddie Blazaczyk ( not sure       > of spelling there ), slower more even. Pittsburg, eastern being Frank       > Yankovic as an example, a bit more quick tempo.              Although I'm not really into polkas, my Soulmate does play accordion and we       jam that way sometimes.              > We don't have time or interest in music aimed at 13 year old girls.              That's an interesting way to look at it. As I said before, I like songs for       their merits, not who they're 'aimed' at or anything else for that matter,       and speaking of which, who was the kind of material you like first 'aimed'       at?              > Adele ... a friend of mine says she has a good voice, said he's just       > waiting for her to write a good song.              So far I've found 5 good songs of hers.              Jim              Set Fire To The Rain       Rolling In The Deep       I'll Be Waiting       Someone Like You       Remedy              You can check them out on You Tube.              Ouisie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca