Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.makers.soloact    |    The fun of being a one-man-band    |    1,456 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 518 of 1,456    |
|    Ouisie to JimD    |
|    Re: band rehearsal day (1/3)    |
|    25 Mar 17 10:27:10    |
      From: someone@anywheret.net              "JimD" wrote in message news:2017032200514247372-email@nowherecom...              > it's what happens to be on the list for first set of upcoming gig.              But who picks the tunes?              > yes, but not in ages.              Mister Bojangles has a nice flow and tells an interesting story, and for       some reason isn't performed much, so I'd think it'd be well received.              > I know most of those, not all. Over time we've played them.              Over time, I think just about every band played most of those tunes on our       setlist ;)              > It was written by a friend who is ( was ) a little older than us. So       > that's probably why is sounds that way.              A good song has nothing to do with its age ;)              > You've heard them all over. Just not something you'd realize took special       > hardware. One would be to play a triad, B, D above it, G above that. Then       > while all three notes are ringing, bend the D to an E then back to a D,       > leaving the other two notes alone.              I tried changing those notes of the G major triad, on the piano and somehow       can't imagine a pedal steel being used very much to do that - not dramatic       enough ;)              > Like I said, hard to do on a regular guitar, impossible on a normal       > keyboard.              A keyboard would have to be able to individually pitch bend each       note...that'd be cool!       Perhaps a setup which uses the sostenuto pedal function for those keyboards       that have it, might be the way.              > Use to sing Crocodile rock, and that one about Daniel my brother, then he       > went all political and we dropped his material.              I've never done Crocodile Rock, but have done Daniel, and I'm a big Elton       John fan, and would be most honored to meet, and particularly to play with       him...but if he ever showed me Any anti Freedom sentiments, I'd tell him, or       any other for that matter, right to their faces, that they're excellent at       Music and should stick to that because when it comes to politics, THEY       SUCK!!!              > I'm not supporting artists who support political parties that want me       > dead.              I Won't support ANYone who want's my Freedom taken away!!!              > Even if their support is all feel good crap and they are basically too       > stupid to know what the libs end game is. Poisoning young minds, that's       > what one of my lib friends thinks religion does. I think his favorite       > politicians actually want people like me dead.              That's been going on for so long now, all kinds of poisoning, and the       religion that does it the most is the secular Crackpot Religion of the       so-called 'entertainment' 'industry', also part of the Ministry of       Propaganda Controlled Media.              > I've been criticized because of that, so I generally don't. Unless maybe       > in exceptional circumstances. Either what I have to say stands on it's       > own or it doesn't. Who I know or have met or am related too shouldn't come       > into most discussions.              I've got an entire lifetime of experience of not giving a damn about what       people 'think' and instead doing my own thinking, which means that I do my       own thing ;)              > A few more details. The Pitot tube had been replaced with a different       > model. Heat wasn't wired up because the plane wasn't certified to fly in       > clouds or rain. I assume major systems weren't moisture proofed. It was a       > test bed, after all. So since the plane wasn't to be in icing conditions,       > the mechanics didn't connect the Pitot heater.              Certainly the possibility of such conditions occurring was known, yet       Nothing was done about it, and that's STUPID!              > Then they did fly it into some light clouds that day. Pilot saw erratic       > airspeed, switched on the Pitot heat. No one told him it wasn't connected.       > Some in ground control knew, didn't speak up OVER THE RADIO, although they       > did talk about it among themselves.              Worse than that - no one put an OVERRIDE capability into the computer!              > Let's see, what else happened. Oh, yeah, the chase plane wasn't hearing       > the X31 pilot talk about the Pitot or the erratic airspeed because his       > radios were acting up and he couldn't hear the X31 pilot.              I wonder if the radios were computer controlled too ;)              > Also, the X-31 had two override modes on the flight control computer, one       > of which would have given him total control. A simple switch he could       > flip. He didn't flip it because he didn't know the Pitot was iced up.              So there was an Override function!       Sounds like the pilot wasn't any smarter than the computer!       As soon as the plane didn't respond right, the very first thing should have       been to bypass the computer!       But of course, it must be remembered that this happened in 1995, and the       Dumbing-Down process was well under way.       Maybe they should have picked a pilot that made a Regular Practice of       THINKING, because if I was flying it, the FIRST thing I'd do is test the       computer bypass and then at the very beginning of any problems, not resort       to bypassing it!              > Once the plane flipped up, he bailed. That was protocol.              It's a lot easier, and far quicker, to flip the switch that bypasses the       computer...and the plane might have been saved, assuming there weren't More       Stupid things to get in the way of it.              > That makes sense. We know NOW what went wrong, but at the time they       > didn't. So bail out. Who knew all it would have took was to flip a switch       > to gain control back. In that instant, for all he knew the tail had broken       > off.              That was the truly Stupid part, not knowing, much less actually Training in       flipping a simple switch which could have saved everything...but then again,       starting with the Dumbed Down '80s, the Designed NON-Thinking Stupidity had       been in place for about 10 years!       It didn't make any sense to me! You do what you can First, and then, Only       when nothing more can be done, punch out, leaving a multimillion dollar       project to crash.              > The take away for me is that the computer system didn't fail. It didn't       > change the Pitot and leave the heat disconnected.              The take away was:       The RETARD, so-called 'engineers', who forgot that Garbage in=Garbage out.       That was Stupid.       Then they didn't hook up the heat for the pitot system, which is ALWAYS       Important...particularly at higher altitudes!       That was Stupid.       The pitot heat system should have had an indicator to let the pilot know       wether or not it was working, but apparently didn't.       That was Stupid.       They Obviously didn't brief the pilot, at least not Sufficiently, about the       condition of the aircraft.       That was Stupid.       The pilot didn't have the Presence of Mind to ASK for ALL the details       regarding the condition of the aircraft.       That was Stupid.              And who knows how many other Stupid things resulted in this 'comedy of       errors', which could have easily ended up being a Tragedy of Stupid       errors!!!       I'm an engineer because I'm always thinking, and I've put a Lot more              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca