Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.makers.soloact    |    The fun of being a one-man-band    |    1,456 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 793 of 1,456    |
|    Ouisie to All    |
|    Re: In Ears, and other random thoughts    |
|    04 Oct 17 10:41:27    |
      From: someone@anywheret.net              "JimD" wrote in message news:2017100322152338910-email@nowherecom...              You saying even the Beatles did it ? The horror :-)              A LOT of bands did that Crap...SHAMEFUL!              > And less reliable. And reqire far more maintance. And are, well, you       > know, heavier :-)              When something that weighs 6.2 lbs can crank out so many watts, and with       such low distortion, the choice is clear...and there are plenty of effects,       some of which actually use a real vacuum tube in their circuits.              > You're the one who implied your church sound guy wasn't qualified. I       > simply agreed. Pro's mostly are. Amatures, maybe, maybe not.              The character I'm referring to is simply incompetent.       Amateurs do what they do out of the Love of doing it...so they're more       Purely motivated, to do their very best, as opposed to 'professionals',       those who do it primarily for the motivation of Filthy Lucre, where that       less than pure motive can easily result in their 'cutting corners', and       quality, just so long as they'll still get paid....or to put it another way,       Pure Motives = Purists, and Impure motives = Impurists.       Where I worked in the electroacoustics field, we had a company president who       told me to my face that if the customer 'wants' Crap, actually if the       customer will buy Crap, then sell them Crap...and *that* is what far too       much more often than not passes for 'professional'....to which I say NO       THANKS!!!              > In order to play at those levels, and not realize how over the top they       > are, they would seem to certainly have hearing loss.              I'd say that's practically a given....they've lost hearing ability because       they were STUPID and now they want to compensate for it by Damaging others'       hearing as well...I think it's Criminal, or at least should be Prosecuted       that way!              > It's not an all or nothing thing, you can have partial hearing loss, you       > know. Like, perhaps they simply don't register anything as " loud " in       > their mind.              They're too STUPID to PAY ATTENTION to it so they keep losing more and more       and more over time.              > I've talked about that here. A few years back I realized I never hear       > anything as " loud " anymore.              I sure do - because I've taken care of my hearing.              > I perceive loud sounds as pain now. Not as sounds.              I perceive them as painful and loud.              > That stuff sounds like medium level sounds with pain added. Nothing       > sounds loud to in in the way it use to. Now I hear quiet and medium all       > the time. Loud sounds don't sound loud, they hurt.              That sounds more like a psychological adjustment response.              > It's how they have always worked and they see not reason to change. As       > long as they keep getting gigs, and can manage to get the gear there,       > they'll use it, and use it as loud as it will go.              On the other hand they have equipment and it works, particularly if they're       not budgeted for new lighter gear....but an aching back might just be able       to one day convince them otherwise ;)              > I have a behringer pmp550M, used it for years. It still works, I just       > don't use in currently. Mine's not quite mic stand mountable tho. Sad,       > huh.              Jim              Looks like a really nice power mixer.              Ouisie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca