From: a_rod_777@yahoo.com   
      
   On Friday, January 26, 2018 at 4:02:34 PM UTC-7, Eric Vinyard wrote:   
   > On Friday, January 26, 2018 at 2:07:05 PM UTC-5, a_rod_777 wrote:   
   > > On Friday, January 26, 2018 at 11:57:18 AM UTC-7, Eric Vinyard wrote:   
   > > > On Friday, January 26, 2018 at 1:50:27 PM UTC-5, a_rod_777 wrote:   
   > > > > The article you posted also confirms translation in the video is   
   accurate. You did read the article in it's entirety right?    
   > > >    
   > > > My point is that you took it at face value and didn't bother to look it   
   up. If you had, you'd have found sources that make it clear that the Prime   
   Minister was not speaking in earnest and was, in fact, making a joke. The   
   "accuracy" of the    
   translation does not just mean that the words themselves are technically   
   correct, but also that you understand the meaning of what was being said. You   
   clearly did not, because you apparently assumed that they were the truth.   
   > > >    
   > > > Why do conspiracy theorists always have such a hard time recognizing   
   humor?   
   > >    
   > > At what point did you see the Prime Minister act like he was joking? In   
   fact it was confirmed that he thought his mic was off which lends credibility   
   he was divulging a secret.    
   > >    
   > > The demeanor of the Prime Minister throughout the entire length of the   
   discussion is very serious, even when the reporter smiles he maintains total   
   seriousness.   
   > >    
   > > Of course their is no way to prove whether he was telling the truth or   
   joking, but at least a red flag has been raised. Just know that this scenerio   
   is not only possible but probale in light of the mounting evidence.   
   > >    
   > > Don't be so quick to give in to your programming which causes you to   
   resist what I am saying. Overwrite your programming by developing a new   
   perspective on the matter and make a sincere attempt to understand the   
   material or you have no basis for    
   argument.   
   >    
   > This is how dry humor works. You have to be completely "serious" when you   
   deliver the joke. Otherwise, the joke isn't as funny. Monty Python knew this.   
   You don't?   
   >    
   > He referred to Men in Black as a "documentary". ...   
      
   Yes, you are correct... he was making fun and he was using dry Humor but he   
   wasn't making fun of the reporter. He was making fun of YOU.   
      
   Still haven't figured it out have you Eric? They are mocking YOU and you are   
   laughing with them. But it's not my job to keep you from acting the fool. If   
   you haven't gotten their little joke by now, perhaps you are not yet capable   
   of comprehending the    
   punchline.    
      
   "The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding”   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)