Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.pink-floyd    |    Worshipping David Gilmour & Roger Waters    |    4,347 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,884 of 4,347    |
|    a_rod_777 to Eric Vinyard    |
|    Re: Keep Talking...    |
|    30 Mar 18 15:54:58    |
      From: a_rod_777@yahoo.com              On Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 7:28:23 PM UTC-6, Eric Vinyard wrote:       > On Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 3:51:46 PM UTC-4, litewave wrote:       > > On Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 7:42:01 PM UTC+2, a_rod_777 wrote:       > >        > > > If nothing isn't something, then how can you refer to it?       > > > Nothing is indeed something... it is a concept.       > >        > > Hmm... nothing is a word whose meaning is that it doesn't refer to       anything.       >        > If there were nothing, there wouldn't be nothing.       >        > Nothing is a state of total nonbeing, but it's also a state that can only be       conceived of relative to a state of somethingness. In order to imagine       nothingness, you have to be in a world where nothingness doesn't exist.       >        > In fact, I'm not sure that pure "nothing" is, ever will be, or ever has been       possible. I've never heard a good argument for how something can come from       nothing.       >        > Even particles that supposedly blink in and out of existence come from the       fabric of spacetime - whatever that even "is".       >        > If total nothingness ever was, it would seem to continue to always be. Which       contradicts my first statement, obviously.              Again, when applying limited human logic, based solely on the physical realm,       you are like dogs chasing your tails around in circles infinitely. The       Universe clearly transcends the physical and must include the mental. Thus       some type of understanding of        the mental Universe is imperative to forming any type of resolution of the       mechanics of reality.              Something and Nothing are identical in nature, but different only in degree.       They exist as a concept or an archetype within the mind of the ALL. We know       the "nothing" does indeed exist because we can conceive of it's opposite in       the physical plane as "       something". It only makes sense that the concept of "nothing" would transcend       the physical plane since it is the extreme opposite pole of the physical       world, which is "something".              "Everything is Dual; everything has poles; everything has its pair of       opposites; like and unlike are the same; opposites are identical in nature,       but different in degree; extremes meet; all truths are but half-truths; all       paradoxes may be reconciled."--       The Kybalion.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca