home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.music.pink-floyd      Worshipping David Gilmour & Roger Waters      4,347 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,905 of 4,347   
   litewave to Eric Vinyard   
   Re: Keep Talking...   
   31 Mar 18 05:43:19   
   
   From: litewave99@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 2:16:31 PM UTC+2, Eric Vinyard wrote:   
   > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 8:14:44 AM UTC-4, Eric Vinyard wrote:   
   > > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 7:52:00 AM UTC-4, litewave wrote:   
   > > > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 4:50:47 AM UTC+2, Eric Vinyard wrote:    
   > > > > Let's get metaphysical.   
   > > > >    
   > > > > If there is nothing, does it mean anything is possible?   
   > > >    
   > > > (Logically) possible = consistently defined. Total nothing is not   
   possible because it is not consistently defined.   
   > >    
   > > Sure, but what I'm asking is if what we think of as "nothingness" is the   
   same thing as "pure potential"?   
   >    
   > It's the only way I can imagine "something" coming from "nothing". But then,   
   it's not *really* nothing, is it?   
      
   That's the point, it's not really nothing. It may be like a starting point of   
   the universe where there is no spacetime yet, no energy, just laws of quantum   
   mechanics and general relativity that enable transition from this state of   
   "nothing" to a state    
   with spacetime and energy. That's what physicist Lawrence Krauss called   
   "nothing" in his book A Universe From Nothing, and he was criticized for it,   
   because laws of physics are not nothing.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca