Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.pink-floyd    |    Worshipping David Gilmour & Roger Waters    |    4,347 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,932 of 4,347    |
|    a_rod_777 to Eric Vinyard    |
|    Re: Keep Talking...    |
|    06 Apr 18 16:58:52    |
      From: a_rod_777@yahoo.com              On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 8:02:50 AM UTC-6, Eric Vinyard wrote:       > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 8:43:20 AM UTC-4, litewave wrote:       > > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 2:16:31 PM UTC+2, Eric Vinyard wrote:       > > > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 8:14:44 AM UTC-4, Eric Vinyard wrote:       > > > > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 7:52:00 AM UTC-4, litewave wrote:       > > > > > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 4:50:47 AM UTC+2, Eric Vinyard wrote:        > > > > > > Let's get metaphysical.       > > > > > >        > > > > > > If there is nothing, does it mean anything is possible?       > > > > >        > > > > > (Logically) possible = consistently defined. Total nothing is not       possible because it is not consistently defined.       > > > >        > > > > Sure, but what I'm asking is if what we think of as "nothingness" is       the same thing as "pure potential"?       > > >        > > > It's the only way I can imagine "something" coming from "nothing". But       then, it's not *really* nothing, is it?       > >        > > That's the point, it's not really nothing. It may be like a starting point       of the universe where there is no spacetime yet, no energy, just laws of       quantum mechanics and general relativity that enable transition from this       state of "nothing" to a        state with spacetime and energy. That's what physicist Lawrence Krauss called       "nothing" in his book A Universe From Nothing, and he was criticized for it,       because laws of physics are not nothing.       >        > Yeah, in that sense "nothing" is just the lack of specific things. And we       don't really know all of the "things" that are involved - we don't even know       what "spacetime" actually IS - because the deeper we look the more       "elementary" particles we find.        Quantum physics I guess is getting closer by defining the things that make       quarks as "bends" in the fabric of spacetime, but it's still basically       speculation right now, isn't it?              Something IS nothing and vice versa. stop thinking in terms of absolute       physical reality. Quantum theory has already shown us that reality does not       exist fundamentally in this state.              Begin to think of the Universe in terms of mentality. As a thought form or a       concept. Archetypes and source code.              Something and nothing are two extremes of the same program.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca