From: litewave99@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 1:50:10 AM UTC+2, a_rod_777 wrote:   
   > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 4:47:44 AM UTC-6, litewave wrote:   
   > > On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 12:28:16 AM UTC+2, a_rod_777 wrote:   
   > > > On Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 12:27:24 PM UTC-6, litewave wrote:   
   > > > > On Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 6:37:46 PM UTC+2, a_rod_777 wrote:   
   > > > > > It's a matter of perspective.   
   > > > >    
   > > > > Then there are no contradictions in reality and so reality is   
   logically consistent.   
   > > >    
   > > > Of course it is,... but consistent by Universal logic which is whole and   
   complete in contrast to Human logic which is premature, pompous and   
   infinitesimally limited.   
   > >    
   > > Logic is simply non-contradiction, which means that nothing is both true   
   and not true in the same sense (or from the same perspective). That's all. It   
   is not "human" or "physical".   
   >    
   > But there is a difference in perspective from the human form to the   
   Universal.   
   > One is incomplete while the other is complete. Is "incomplete" logic still   
   considered "non-contradiction" by your standards?   
      
   From the universal (all-encompassing) perspective all details are known, but   
   even if we don't know that perspective we at least know that from that   
   perspective nothing is both true and not true. So we know that the principle   
   of non-contradiction (logic)    
   applies to the whole reality, even if we don't know all the details of reality.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)