Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.music.pink-floyd    |    Worshipping David Gilmour & Roger Waters    |    4,347 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,028 of 4,347    |
|    Eric Vinyard to myriadsma...@yahoo.com    |
|    Re: The Church Is The Bell That Divides    |
|    11 Apr 18 20:45:42    |
      From: chinagreenelvis@gmail.com              On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 11:36:18 PM UTC-4, myriadsma...@yahoo.com       wrote:       > On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 10:33:38 PM UTC-5, myriadsma...@yahoo.com       wrote:       > > On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 10:29:40 PM UTC-5, Eric Vinyard wrote:       > > > On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 11:11:28 PM UTC-4, myriads       a...@yahoo.com wrote:       > > > > On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 10:09:16 PM UTC-5, Eric Vinyard wrote:       > > > > > On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 10:26:58 PM UTC-4, myr       adsma...@yahoo.com wrote:       > > > > > > > Damned quality stuff there. I hadn't seen this before.       > > > > > >       > > > > > >       > > > > > > Damned fine commentation there.       > > > > >       > > > > > It's more to think about than to respond to.       > > > >       > > > > Pirsig would ask what you mean by 'quality'.       > > >       > > > Quality is relative.       > > >       > > > In this case, I would say that a post is of high quality when the way to       proceed with the conversation is either not immediately obvious, or the       content at least doesn't possess any clear errors or lack something that needs       to be addressed.       > > >       > > > There is a wonderful moment in many conversations and debates where       someone says something worth *considering* rather than instantly rebutting or       affirming. Litewave's assessment is, in my opinion, one of those.       > > >       > > > Have I made myself clear? Or should all of that have gone without saying?       > > >       > > > ;)       > >       > > Does not all conversation lack something that needs to be addressed?       >       > Quality conversation most of all?              Not so much conversation, but the content of any given part of it. Even still,       maybe, but the lack is not always apparent. I mean, if you want to really get       down to it, anything always lacks everything else by definition.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca