> Stop suggesting what you mean, and start saying it.   
      
   "Because the person or persons responsible for designing the layout of the   
   supplemental materials (presumably Thorgerson and Gilmour) thought that having   
   all of the page numbers be the same colored heads facing the same direction   
   would be uninteresting.   
      
   [i]In other words, the orientation of the heads might just be arbitrary.[/i]"   
      
   LOL. Richly bizarre.   
      
   These words reveal your persona a fool or a troll. A monkey maybe. Tomas has   
   covered the directionality of the brain hemispheres in stark detail, as have   
   I, and in your presence. The evidence is clear and irrefutable. I shan't cover   
   it again. It's a    
   google search away. Suffice it to say you have missed 2500 years of classical   
   literature from Homer to the Roman classics to Corinthians all the way to   
   present day.   
      
   The question is not whether this interpretation is inaccurate; the question is   
   whether or not it is adequate.   
      
   In that regard, I have no quibble with Phil's interpretation of the   
   significance of the page numbers, or its legitimacy, or its clever   
   implementation. [i]However, it is the answer to a puzzle, not the Publius   
   enigma, or any enigma, great or small.[/i]   
      
   You have learned to think deductively, after a fashion, and you hold on to   
   your conclusions rabidly, to the exclusion of other more inductive solutions.   
   Such a mindset as you have has survival value in defining and obtaining the   
   object of desire. However,   
    as Anthony might say, in so doing, you miss the forest for the trees.   
      
   And look out for that tree.   
      
   Last word is yours... I won't address you again. That would be wrong.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)