XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, alt.fan.nirvana   
   XPost: alt.music.nirvana, alt.music.hardcore, alt.music.punk   
   From: meat@insurgent.orq   
      
   On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:01:58 +0000, I pwned Brawl-Hall.com and all I got   
   was this stupid t-shirt that says 'Banned'. wrote:   
      
   > Meat Plow wrote in   
   > news:pan.2005.01.31.16.12.39.588000@insurgent.orq:   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:03:38 -0800, Bill Cleere wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> "spooge" wrote in message   
   >>> news:Xns95EED429B804mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...   
   >>>> "Bill Cleere" wrote in   
   >>>> news:365n7qF4rdn73U1@individual.net:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> > "spooge" wrote in message   
   >>>> > news:Xns95EE9503C11D2mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...   
   >>>> >> "Bill Cleere" wrote in   
   >>>> >> news:360o1cF4t0rk0U1@individual.net:   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> > "spooge" wrote in message   
   >>>> >> > news:Xns95ECCF36E1865mypostdammet@petitmorte.net...   
   >>>> >> >> Soapy wrote in   
   >>>> >> >> news:Xns95EBCAF975EA7soapy@204.153.244.156:   
   >>>> >> >>   
   >>>> >> >> [...]   
   >>>> >> >>   
   >>>> >> >> > Only Aukers think rot13 is clever.   
   >>>> >> >>   
   >>>> >> >> You should probably start one of those super clever sn*h   
   >>>> >> >> cascades to show people how special you are. And don't forget   
   >>>> >> >> to write one as "won".   
   >>>> >> >>   
   >>>> >> >> Did you initiate that one/won thing, or are you being your   
   >>>> >> >> usual mindless parrot self and using someone else's schtick to   
   >>>> >> >> try and compensate for your lack of intelligence?   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> > Spooge   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> Wasn't talking to you, Billie.   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> Why is it that a question directed to one of you Tapeworms   
   >>>> >> becomes a question to all of you?   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > It's a little thing called a "thread", butthead. It's how it   
   >>>> > works.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes, it's a thread, Bill. No, the question wasn't asked of you,   
   >>>> Bill.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Had I cared specifically about your thoughts on the subject, Bill, I   
   >>>> would have asked you by name, Bill. I didn't. Because, Bill, I   
   >>>> don't give a damn. Or words to that effect. Bill.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Did it ask for help in email, Bill, or do the 2 of you just have a   
   >>>> special understanding that you'll answer for it? You see, if I know   
   >>>> that you'll be doing that, Bill, I'll know to whom I should address   
   >>>> questions. I prefer dealing with the ventriloquist rather than the   
   >>>> dummy. Not that I see a lot of difference between the 2 of you in   
   >>>> that regard, Bill.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The above question was directed specifically to you, Bill. Anyone   
   >>>> else is more than welcome to answer, that said, Bill, your answer   
   >>>> is of interest to me this time. I may or may not respond to replies   
   >>>> from other folks.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> See how that works, Bill? Ain't Usenet just a blast?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Oh my. Are you able to deal with multiple questions in one post?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you're real lucky, perhaps I made a spelling mistake you can use   
   >>>> as a diversion so you don't have to answer what has been asked of   
   >>>> you.   
   >>>   
   >>> I think I'll just the above stand as an example of how not to use   
   >>> sarcasm effectively.   
   >>   
   >> Just a troll Gov, right billy?   
   >>   
   >> hahahah   
   >>   
   >   
   > Were you drinking a Pabst 32oz can when you wrote this? Because it reads   
   > like it.   
      
   Sober up and it will make some sense.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|