From: artis@nospamplease.net.invalid   
      
   "John Nichel"  wrote in message   
   news:4d9af0b8$0$20471$c3e8da3$eb767761@news.astraweb.com...   
   > On 4/5/2011 1:05 AM, Artisan wrote:   
   >>   
   >> "iDonkey"  wrote in message   
   >> news:2011040419091640745-donkey@thistlebushcom...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You're starting to sound as if you favor treason.* Here's a clue:   
   >>>> supporting the /country/ or the /office/ does NOT equate to   
   >>>> supporting the /individual/ who /occupies/ that office. If you can't   
   >>>> make that crucial distinction, then you're probably naive enough to   
   >>>> believe that all non-Mac owners are "haters".   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I wouldn't call that "treason" - I just don't believe the US   
   >>> Government is legitimate anymore.   
   >>   
   >> Then you're not a Donkey anymore, you're Chicken Little. It's a foregone   
   >> conclusion that we'll be back to Republican rule in a few years, give or   
   >> take. The Republicans already control most of Congress, both at the   
   >> national and state levels. This would appear to contradict your rantings   
   >> and ravings. Don't look now, but Glenn Beck called, he thinks you're   
   >> getting "a little hysterical".   
   >>   
   >   
   > Not to side with iAss, but if/when the government goes back to Republican   
   > rule, doesn't exactly legitimize it.  Well, it's more a failure of the   
   > people in this country when we keep flipping between worthless party and   
   > moronic party, but you get my point, right?   
   >   
      
   My point was that you don't stop "supporting the country" because you don't   
   like the person who currently resides in the Oval Office.  I think the   
   argument hinges on just what exactly "supporting the country" means.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)