aa69fbf4   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa, rec.aviation.military, rec.aviation.piloting   
   From: dantomel@comcast.net   
      
   On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:47:19 -0700 (PDT), LIBERATOR wrote:   
      
   > NASA isn't going to spend time on such a device you say is "way   
   > beyond" our capacity, because they have a massive friggin flying   
   > saucer fleet they got from Adolf Hitler. Why would anyone spend time   
   > on such an advanced device to probe from earth, when they can go   
   > there in person in seconds, MERE seconds to travel 100 billion light   
   > years by flying saucer.   
      
   Well now, this is the crux of the matter, is it not? Either one believes   
   in the NASA that NASA spins in tale or one believes that NASA lies.   
      
   I do however seriously doubt that there the use of mechanical means   
   (craft) to cover 100b miles when adjusting the wrap of the time-space   
   continuum makes travel so much easier.   
      
   Then again, how large, physically, can a time portal be? What can or   
   cannot be economically and timely  transported?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)