XPost: sci.physics, sci.archaeology, sci.astro   
   XPost: alt.messianic   
   From: Kenthz@comcast.net   
      
   Linda Lee wrote:   
   > On Jun 15, 8:40 am, Nomen Nescio wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 "Atheist are Stooges" wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>"Apobetics" wrote in message   
   >>>news:1181863595.553687.80680@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Jun 14, 11:14 am, "Atheist are Stooges"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>"Tiktaalik" wrote   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Jun 14, 4:40 pm, Apobetics aka   
   >>>>>>IKnowIAmAnOffensivePieceOfOrdure wailed:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>The Myth of Evolution   
   >>>>>>>"Dr. Louis Bounoure, former director of research at the French   
   >>>>>>>National Center for Scientific Research, calls evolution "a fairy tale   
   >>>>>>>for grown-ups." It actually is a cruel hoax! In fact, the arguments   
   >>>>>>>that are used to support evolutionary theory are astonishingly weak   
   >>>>>>>and many are downright frauds.   
   >>>>>>>First, the fossil record is an embarrassment to evolutionists. No   
   >>>>>>>verifiable transitions from one kind to another have as yet been   
   >>>>>>>found. Charles Darwin had an excuse: in his day fossil finds were   
   >>>>>>>relatively scarce. Today, however, we have an abundance of fossils.   
   >>>>>>>Still, we have yet to find even one legitimate transition from one   
   >>>>>>>kind to another (sorry no apes to humans and no cats to dogs).   
   >>>>>>>Furthermore, in Darwin's day such enormously complex structures as a   
   >>>>>>>human egg were thought to be quite simple - for all practical   
   >>>>>>>purposes, little more than a microscopic blob of gelatin (the same   
   >>>>>>>argument used by Planed Parenthood to justify abortions today).   
   >>>>>>>Today, we know that a fertilized egg is among the most organized,   
   >>>>>>>complex structures in the universe. In an age of scientific gains, it   
   >>>>>>>is incredible to think people are willing to maintain that something   
   >>>>>>>so vastly complex arose by chance and accident. Like an egg or the   
   >>>>>>>human eye, the universe is a masterpiece of precision and design that   
   >>>>>>>could not have come into existence by blind chance.   
   >>>>>>>Finally, while chance is a blow to the theory of evolution, the basic   
   >>>>>>>laws of science, including law of effects and their causes -energy   
   >>>>>>>conservation and entropy - undergird the creation model for origins   
   >>>>>>>leaving evolution with no foundation at all in science and making it   
   >>>>>>>just another faith - based religion."   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>The Bible Answer Book, Hank Hanegraaff, Countryman Press, 2004   
   >>   
   >>>>>>A cretin citing a moron. How typical.   
   >>   
   >>>>>Of course you provide no scientific rebuttal because you are incapable of   
   >>>>>doing so.   
   >>>>>Talking mud, flying pigs, magic monkeys, and breathing rocks.   
   >>>>>It's all right there in the church of Darwin the apostate preacher who   
   once   
   >>>>>practiced witchcraft in the South Pacific.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>______________________________________________________________   
   >>>>I never read or answer these naked apes. I do not suffer fools.   
   >>>>Have you noticed that they only attack the person and never have   
   >>>>anything on the subject?   
   >>>>This is the standard MO of the lost.   
   >>>>Who cares what they attempt to think (atheist -think...oxymoron)   
   >>   
   >>>Yea and never forget we come from rocks--   
   >>   
   >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----   
   >>   
   >>(sorry for the long reply, but this got me to thinking)   
   >>   
   >>I agree with what you're saying, as the sixth evening and morning   
   >>in Genesis chapter one unambiguously states that Adam (pronounced   
   >>"aw-dawm", meaning the red race, the first race, of human beings)   
   >>was Created in the image and similitude of the elohiym (which is   
   >>plural, ergo the Gods, better known as God the Creator), but here   
   >>is an interesting quote from Jesus' first cousin John the Baptist:   
   >>   
   >> "...for I say unto you, that God is able of these   
   >> stones to raise up children unto Abraham"   
   >> --Matthew 3:9, Luke 3:8 AV   
   >>   
   >>This goes back to Genesis 2:6-7, most of which agrees pristinely   
   >>with the creation myths of other cultures. Moses was a very-well   
   >>educated, royal Egyptian high priest in the temple of Vulcan. So   
   >>it's not surprising that his incomparably erudite understanding   
   >>of the Creation myth agreed those of others, e.g., that mankind   
   >>was "Created from the dust and spittle of the earth", "Created   
   >>from the dust and foamy-crest of the salty ocean waves", etc.   
   >>   
   >>One more quote, where Jesus said:   
   >>   
   >> "...Among them that are born of women there hath not risen   
   >> a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that   
   >> is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he."   
   >> --Matthew 11:11; cf. Luke 7:28 AV   
   >>   
   >>So everything that John the Baptist ever said, you can take it   
   >>to the bank. God can do anything -- obviously! I'm sure every   
   >>believer will agree with that. But why the Atheists seem hell-   
   >>bent for leather to "debunk" things which they either don't   
   >>understand, or as you've pointed out, Atheists don't *want*   
   >>to understand, you seem to have a better grasp of why Atheists   
   >>don't want to understand, than I have. I just think Atheists   
   >>are mentally insane. I truly believe someone has to be insane   
   >>not to believe in God the Creator, our heavenly father, the   
   >>One Universal God of all. So what is the Atheists' problem?   
   >   
   >   
   >>From what I've seen on these newsgroups, reluctance to change and fear   
   > of God's punishment (which they believe to be Hell) leads some people   
   > to convince themselves that God does not exist and will never punish   
   > anyone. Atheists are insane because their conscious mind maintains   
   > the delusion that God does not exist, while their subconscious mind   
   > *knows* that God does exist. This is viewed as a survival mechanism   
   > for them (their ego), which is why they're not above outright lies to   
   > promote their fallacies.   
   >   
   >   
   >>Like what makes Atheists believe in their "big bang" theory?   
   >>I think the reason they believe that, is because to believe   
   >>that the Universe is infinite and eternal, that sounds too   
   >>much like God the Creator. So I think that that is why the   
   >>Atheists prefer their pet "big bang" theory, because they   
   >>can't get their fragile egos around infinity and eternity.   
   >>   
   >>Who can, after all? That's why the ultimate name for God,   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|