XPost: sci.physics, sci.archaeology, sci.astro   
   XPost: alt.messianic   
   From: anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it   
      
   On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Linda Lee  wrote:   
   >On Jun 15, 8:40 am, Nomen Nescio  wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 "Atheist are Stooges"  wrote:   
   >> >"Apobetics"  wrote in message   
   >> >news:1181863595.553687.80680@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...   
   >> >> On Jun 14, 11:14 am, "Atheist are Stooges"    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >> >>> "Tiktaalik"  wrote   
   >> >>> > On Jun 14, 4:40 pm, Apobetics aka   
   >> >>> > IKnowIAmAnOffensivePieceOfOrdure wailed:   
   >> >>> >> The Myth of Evolution   
   >> >>> >> "Dr. Louis Bounoure, former director of research at the French   
   >> >>> >> National Center for Scientific Research, calls evolution "a fairy   
   tale   
   >> >>> >> for grown-ups."  It actually is a cruel hoax!  In fact, the arguments   
   >> >>> >> that are used to support evolutionary theory are astonishingly weak   
   >> >>> >> and many are downright frauds.   
   >> >>> >> First, the fossil record is an embarrassment to evolutionists.  No   
   >> >>> >> verifiable transitions from one kind to another have as yet been   
   >> >>> >> found.  Charles Darwin had an excuse: in his day fossil finds were   
   >> >>> >> relatively scarce.  Today, however, we have an abundance of fossils.   
   >> >>> >> Still, we have yet to find even one legitimate transition from one   
   >> >>> >> kind to another (sorry no apes to humans and no cats to dogs).   
   >> >>> >> Furthermore, in Darwin's day such enormously complex structures as a   
   >> >>> >> human egg were thought to be quite simple - for all practical   
   >> >>> >> purposes, little more than a microscopic blob of gelatin (the same   
   >> >>> >> argument used by Planed Parenthood to justify abortions today).   
   >> >>> >> Today, we know that  a fertilized egg is among the most organized,   
   >> >>> >> complex structures in the universe.  In an age of scientific gains,   
   it   
   >> >>> >> is incredible to think people are willing to maintain that something   
   >> >>> >> so vastly complex arose by chance and accident.  Like an egg or the   
   >> >>> >> human eye, the universe is a masterpiece of precision and design that   
   >> >>> >> could not have come into existence by blind chance.   
   >> >>> >> Finally, while chance is a blow to the theory of evolution, the basic   
   >> >>> >> laws of science, including law of effects and their causes -energy   
   >> >>> >> conservation and entropy - undergird the creation model for origins   
   >> >>> >> leaving evolution with no foundation at all in science and making it   
   >> >>> >> just another faith - based religion."   
   >>   
   >> >>> >> The Bible Answer Book, Hank Hanegraaff, Countryman Press, 2004   
   >>   
   >> >>> > A cretin citing a moron. How typical.   
   >>   
   >> >>> Of course you provide no scientific rebuttal because you are incapable   
   of   
   >> >>> doing so.   
   >> >>> Talking mud, flying pigs, magic monkeys, and breathing rocks.   
   >> >>> It's all right there in the church of Darwin the apostate preacher who   
   >> >>> once   
   >> >>> practiced witchcraft in the South Pacific.   
   >> >> ______________________________________________________________   
   >> >> I never read or answer these naked apes.  I do not suffer fools.   
   >> >> Have you noticed that they only attack the person and never have   
   >> >> anything on the subject?   
   >> >> This is the standard MO of the lost.   
   >> >> Who cares what they attempt to think (atheist -think...oxymoron)   
   >>   
   >> >Yea and never forget we come from rocks--   
   >>   
   >> (sorry for the long reply, but this got me to thinking)   
   >>   
   >> I agree with what you're saying, as the sixth evening and morning   
   >> in Genesis chapter one unambiguously states that Adam (pronounced   
   >> "aw-dawm", meaning the red race, the first race, of human beings)   
   >> was Created in the image and similitude of the elohiym (which is   
   >> plural, ergo the Gods, better known as God the Creator), but here   
   >> is an interesting quote from Jesus' first cousin John the Baptist:   
   >>   
   >>         "...for I say unto you, that God is able of these   
   >>             stones to raise up children unto Abraham"   
   >>             --Matthew 3:9, Luke 3:8 AV   
   >>   
   >> This goes back to Genesis 2:6-7, most of which agrees pristinely   
   >> with the creation myths of other cultures. Moses was a very-well   
   >> educated, royal Egyptian high priest in the temple of Vulcan. So   
   >> it's not surprising that his incomparably erudite understanding   
   >> of the Creation myth agreed those of others, e.g., that mankind   
   >> was "Created from the dust and spittle of the earth", "Created   
   >> from the dust and foamy-crest of the salty ocean waves", etc.   
   >>   
   >> One more quote, where Jesus said:   
   >>   
   >>   "...Among them that are born of women there hath not risen   
   >>    a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that   
   >>    is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he."   
   >>    --Matthew 11:11; cf. Luke 7:28 AV   
   >>   
   >> So everything that John the Baptist ever said, you can take it   
   >> to the bank. God can do anything -- obviously! I'm sure every   
   >> believer will agree with that. But why the Atheists seem hell-   
   >> bent for leather to "debunk" things which they either don't   
   >> understand, or as you've pointed out, Atheists don't *want*   
   >> to understand, you seem to have a better grasp of why Atheists   
   >> don't want to understand, than I have. I just think Atheists   
   >> are mentally insane. I truly believe someone has to be insane   
   >> not to believe in God the Creator, our heavenly father, the   
   >> One Universal God of all. So what is the Atheists' problem?   
   >   
   >>From what I've seen on these newsgroups, reluctance to change and fear   
   >of God's punishment (which they believe to be Hell) leads some people   
   >to convince themselves that God does not exist and will never punish   
   >anyone.  Atheists are insane because their conscious mind maintains   
   >the delusion that God does not exist, while their subconscious mind   
   >*knows* that God does exist.  This is viewed as a survival mechanism   
   >for them (their ego), which is why they're not above outright lies to   
   >promote their fallacies.   
   >   
   >> Like what makes Atheists believe in their "big bang" theory?   
   >> I think the reason they believe that, is because to believe   
   >> that the Universe is infinite and eternal, that sounds too   
   >> much like God the Creator. So I think that that is why the   
   >> Atheists prefer their pet "big bang" theory, because they   
   >> can't get their fragile egos around infinity and eternity.   
   >>   
   >> Who can, after all?  That's why the ultimate name for God,   
   >> and for the dimensions, planes, heavens, of God's Universe,   
   >> is deemed ultimately ineffable, unspeakable, indescribable,   
   >> etc. It's like that classic 1962 film 'Barabbas', starring   
   >> Anthony Quinn, where he visits the house of aging Lazarus,   
   >> and asks him "what's it like?" "What's it like to be dead?"   
   >> And Lazarus replies with what is arguably the best-written   
   >> description of what it's like to be dead, ever rendered in   
   >> the history of cinema. I googled for the film's script, but   
   >> to no avail. I do remember that Lazarus told him "how do I   
   >> tell an unborn child what life is like? Death is like that."   
   >>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)