XPost: sci.archaeology, sci.astro, alt.messianic   
   From: Kenthz@comcast.net   
      
   Doug Weller wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:36:21 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Roy Jose Lorr   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>Matt Giwer wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>Roy Jose Lorr wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>cormac wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>The concept of a god is not necessary in Buddism either.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Are you saying that Confucians and Buddhists are incapable of   
   >>>>contemplating the abstract?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>    Why would anyone want to contemplate he brain fart of silly,   
   >>>superstitious people?   
   >>   
   >>Irrelevant non answer.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>Excusing God from one's religion does not deter the mind from   
   >>>>asserting him.  Even denial of God's existence asserts Him.  There is   
   >>>>no way to rid the mind of the concept.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>    The mind asserts witches, black magic, alien abductions, unicorns,   
   >>>and so many thousand other things it is likely impossible to produce an   
   >>>inclusive list.   
   >>   
   >>Irrelevant.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>    What does that have to do with reality?   
   >>   
   >>The reality is that the concept of God in each and every   
   >>mind is natural and indelible.   
   >   
   >   
   > Or gods?  Interesting that this idiot uses the word 'God' when you might   
   > think he'd say 'god' or 'supernatural being' or plural, etc.   
      
   Moron, the word "God" is merely one human way of naming [THE   
   ONE], the only omnipotent singularity, that state beyond   
   which no thing is reducible.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)