XPost: sci.archaeology, sci.astro, alt.messianic   
   From: Kenthz@comcast.net   
      
   Doug Weller wrote:   
      
   > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 01:16:15 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Roy Jose Lorr   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>Doug Weller wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:36:21 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Roy Jose Lorr   
   >>>wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Matt Giwer wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Roy Jose Lorr wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>cormac wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>The concept of a god is not necessary in Buddism either.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>Are you saying that Confucians and Buddhists are incapable of   
   >>>>>>contemplating the abstract?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   Why would anyone want to contemplate he brain fart of silly,   
   >>>>>superstitious people?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Irrelevant non answer.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>Excusing God from one's religion does not deter the mind from   
   >>>>>>asserting him.  Even denial of God's existence asserts Him.  There is   
   >>>>>>no way to rid the mind of the concept.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   The mind asserts witches, black magic, alien abductions, unicorns,   
   >>>>>and so many thousand other things it is likely impossible to produce an   
   >>>>>inclusive list.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Irrelevant.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   What does that have to do with reality?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>The reality is that the concept of God in each and every   
   >>>>mind is natural and indelible.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Or gods?  Interesting that this idiot uses the word 'God' when you might   
   >>>think he'd say 'god' or 'supernatural being' or plural, etc.   
   >>   
   >>Moron, the word "God" is merely one human way of naming [THE   
   >>ONE], the only omnipotent singularity, that state beyond   
   >>which no thing is reducible.   
   >   
   >   
   > Ah, you mean The Invisible Pink Unicorn. Now I understand! You know The   
   > Truth and facts are irrelevant.   
      
   When you show one thing in the universe that is reducible to   
   a singularity we can discuss your evolution fantasies.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)